[PATCH][web]

2011-04-07 Thread jeremy
I've recently built Wayland following the instructions on http://wayland.freedesktop.org/building.html, and it required the use of a patch to mesa, that was posted on the listserv last month: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2011-March/000817.html I have added instructions to bu

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Bill Spitzak
Michal Suchanek wrote: It's not difficult for a D-Bus service implementation to monitor for disconnection events by its clients. If mplayer crashes, wayland could easily clear out the inhibition that mplayer had installed. Which means that it works when mplayer crashes but not when it locks up

Re: [PATCH:wayland-demos 1/2] Make sure pkg-config is available when autoreconfing.

2011-04-07 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
2011/4/7 Cyril Brulebois : > Kristian Høgsberg (07/04/2011): >> The way I use the pkgconfig macros is pretty standard - I don't see >> any other projects use this extra check... > > I discussed that with pkg-config upstream past night, and he agreed > documenting such a check would be nice. Just h

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Michal Suchanek
2011/4/7 Joakim Sindholt : > On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:04 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> 2011/4/7 Corbin Simpson : >> > 2011/4/7 Michal Suchanek : >> >> If you have some input on awesomeness of dbus which I miss I am all >> >> ears but so far nobody could point out any advantage to me when this >>

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Joakim Sindholt
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:04 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2011/4/7 Corbin Simpson : > > 2011/4/7 Michal Suchanek : > >> If you have some input on awesomeness of dbus which I miss I am all > >> ears but so far nobody could point out any advantage to me when this > >> topic came to the table. > >>

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Christopher Friedt
2011/4/7 Michal Suchanek : > This is somewhat offtopic here so I suggest that if your further input > relates only to how awesome dbus is you send it offlist. Thank-you! ___ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.free

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Michal Suchanek
2011/4/7 Corbin Simpson : > 2011/4/7 Michal Suchanek : >> If you have some input on awesomeness of dbus which I miss I am all >> ears but so far nobody could point out any advantage to me when this >> topic came to the table. >> >> Sure, dbus likely includes a protocol for passing around the messag

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Corbin Simpson
2011/4/7 Michal Suchanek : > If you have some input on awesomeness of dbus which I miss I am all > ears but so far nobody could point out any advantage to me when this > topic came to the table. > > Sure, dbus likely includes a protocol for passing around the messages > but I am sure there are alre

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Michal Suchanek
2011/4/7 Corbin Simpson : > 2011/4/6 Michal Suchanek : >> JFYI I have a desktop environment running completely without dbus. >> That does not mean that dbus cannot or should not be used. It is just >> not as standard as the two most bloated desktop environments might >> make it seem. AFAICT dbus is

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Michal Suchanek
2011/4/6 Matt Hoosier : > 2011/4/6 Michal Suchanek >> >> 2011/4/6 Joakim Sindholt : >> >> JFYI I have a desktop environment running completely without dbus. >> That does not mean that dbus cannot or should not be used. It is just >> not as standard as the two most bloated desktop environments mig

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 6 April 2011 20:57, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 6 April 2011 18:34, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>> 2011/4/6 Michal Suchanek : 2011/4/5 Kristian Høgsberg : > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Michal Suchanek > wrote: >> Hello,

Re: [PATCH:wayland-demos 1/2] Make sure pkg-config is available when autoreconfing.

2011-04-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Kristian Høgsberg (07/04/2011): > The way I use the pkgconfig macros is pretty standard - I don't see > any other projects use this extra check... I discussed that with pkg-config upstream past night, and he agreed documenting such a check would be nice. Just haven't opened a bug entry with a pat

Re: [PATCH:wayland-demos 1/2] Make sure pkg-config is available when autoreconfing.

2011-04-07 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > If pkg-config isn't available, autoreconf -vfi will succeed, but > ./configure will break badly: > | ./configure: line 3424: syntax error near unexpected token > `PKG_CHECK_MODULES' > | ./configure: line 3424: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(COMPOSITOR

Re: [PATCH:wayland-demos 2/2] Check return value of XOpenDisplay().

2011-04-07 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Instead of calling XGetXCBConnection() blindly, check XOpenDisplay()'s > return value to avoid a possible segfault in the former. That happens if > $DISPLAY is set, but if that display isn't available. Ah, yes, thanks. Applied. Kristian

Re: wayland screen locker and security in general

2011-04-07 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 7 April 2011 02:00, cat wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Michal Suchanek > wrote: >> >> On 6 April 2011 18:34, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> > 2011/4/6 Michal Suchanek : >> >> 2011/4/5 Kristian Høgsberg : >> >>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Michal Suchanek >> >>> wrote: >> Hel