What month do we think it will be when we have a stable GTK that runs over
Wayland. Probably also need a Qt in order to cut over completely. For example
I have an HP printer and the printer management application is written in
Python over PyQt over Qt and I would lose the ability to see how mu
On 12/09/2010 03:00 PM, wayland-devel-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> Send wayland-devel mailing list submissions to
> wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FWD to right address..
- Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: State-of-the-Art OpenGL
Datum: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:22:06 +0100
Von: Kai Mast
An: Carl-Philip Haensch
Am 09.12.2010 21:11, schrieb Carl-Philip Haensch:
>>
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 21:11 +0100, Carl-Philip Haensch wrote:
> > There's a couple of tricky things about GL in Wayland right now. First
> > of, it's all EGL and GLES2. Longer term we'll need an answer for apps
> > that need full GL, but the problem is that libGL pulls in GLX and all
> > the X dep
There's a couple of tricky things about GL in Wayland right now. First
of, it's all EGL and GLES2. Longer term we'll need an answer for apps
that need full GL, but the problem is that libGL pulls in GLX and all
the X dependencies. The other thing is that there is no EGLSurface
support in Wayland
Kristian, Others,
On 12/09/2010 08:36 PM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
I'm interested in how Wayland deals with input& about mouse coordinates.
Currently Blender can fake off screen mouse coordinates on X11 by
hiding the cursor warping the position.
However it would be a lot nicer if the Wayland
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Campbell Barton wrote:
> Hi there, I'm interested in porting blender3d to Wayland. Currently we
> use an internal library which is a bit like SDL, talking to X11, Win32
> and Cocoa directly.
Hi Campbell,
That's exciting, let me know what problems you run into, but
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael Steinert
wrote:
> * Scanner
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the patch. There's a lot of good stuff there, but there's
a little to much for just one patch. I'd appreciate if you could
split it into different patches that each do one thing and repost the
patch ser