On 2014-03-18 0:44, Hugh Williams wrote:
> Frans,
>
> On 17 Mar 2014, at 15:53, Frans Knibbe | Geodan
> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-11-08 7:37, Quentin wrote:
>>> Is it likely that Virtuoso 7 will come to support xsd:boolean without
>>> integer conversion?
>>>
>>>
>> A good question. I have just noticed
On 3/17/14 8:04 PM, Quentin wrote:
Hi Hugh,
Would:
select ?o datatype(?o) from where {?s ?p ?o . filter (?o =
"false"^^xsd:boolean) }
return "False xsd:boolean"?
Or nothing, because ?o is actually an integer?
Based on:
Data Creation:
with graph
insert { "true"^^
Hi Hugh,
Would:
select ?o datatype(?o) from where {?s ?p ?o . filter (?o =
"false"^^xsd:boolean) }
return "False xsd:boolean"?
Or nothing, because ?o is actually an integer?
On 18 March 2014 10:44, Hugh Williams wrote:
> Frans,
>
> On 17 Mar 2014, at 15:53, Frans Knibbe | Geodan
> wrote:
>
>
Frans,
On 17 Mar 2014, at 15:53, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote:
> On 2013-11-08 7:37, Quentin wrote:
>> Is it likely that Virtuoso 7 will come to support xsd:boolean without
>> integer conversion?
>>
>>
> A good question. I have just noticed that when I import boolean literals
> they are conve
On 2013-11-08 7:37, Quentin wrote:
> Is it likely that Virtuoso 7 will come to support xsd:boolean without
> integer conversion?
>
>
A good question. I have just noticed that when I import boolean literals
they are converted to integers. That's using Virtuoso 7.1. Apparently it
has to do with th
Is it likely that Virtuoso 7 will come to support xsd:boolean without
integer conversion?
--
Quentin | Clear Blue Water Pty Ltd
quent...@clearbluewater.com.au
--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate
