subject:"\[Virtuoso\-users\] prefix ... <..._>"

Re: [Virtuoso-users] prefix ... <..._>

2009-10-18 Thread Ivan Mikhailov

Hello Alan, The previous patch (091017sparql_l_names.diff) was inaccurate, please rollback it and apply the attached one instead. Sorry for inconveniences, Ivan Mikhailov OpenLink Software http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 17:47 +0700, Ivan Mikhailov wrote: > Hello Alan, >

Re: [Virtuoso-users] prefix ... <..._>

2009-10-17 Thread Ivan Mikhailov

Hello Alan, That's because our SPARQL lexer remained unchanged since early draft of SPARQL. My fault. The update to the http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-query-20080115/ rules is in the attached patch. The patch is also in CVS so it will appear in the next release of Virtuoso Open Source.

[Virtuoso-users] prefix ... <..._>

2009-10-16 Thread Alan Bawden

A colleague complains that Virtuoso rejects the following as a syntax error: prefix go: select count(*) where { ?s ?p go:0005739 } Either this is a Virtuoso bug, or someone should be able to quote chapter and verse on why a prefix cannot end with an "_"! --