On 3/13/13 12:21 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
On 13 Mar 2013, at 15:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Note, visible really means "webby" i.e., visibility to humans and machines :-)
Important, I agree :) but can you elaborate on the visibility requirements with
regards to the result of SPARQL
Hi Kingsley,
On 13 Mar 2013, at 15:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> Note, visible really means "webby" i.e., visibility to humans and machines :-)
Important, I agree :) but can you elaborate on the visibility requirements with
regards to the result of SPARQL queries or dereferencing a URI hosted
On 3/13/13 11:11 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello Rumi,
On 13 Mar 2013, at 15:03, Rumi wrote:
The institution in question should honor the CC-BY SA terms i.e. -- it MUST
attribute OpenLink in a visible way.
In this case you can change the logo but still**need to acknowledge (in a
web-by way) O
Hello Rumi,
On 13 Mar 2013, at 15:03, Rumi wrote:
> The institution in question should honor the CC-BY SA terms i.e. -- it MUST
> attribute OpenLink in a visible way.
> In this case you can change the logo but still**need to acknowledge (in a
> web-by way) OpenLink in your application.
>
>
Hello Nuno,
On 13-Mar-13 10:45 AM, Rumi wrote:
Hello Nuno,
On 13-Mar-13 10:36 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello Rumi,
Thanks for the info, can you point me to some T&C page? Since the
data we are using is supplied by another institution I've been asked
to replace the logo. Would having more logo
Hello Nuno,
On 13-Mar-13 10:36 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello Rumi,
Thanks for the info, can you point me to some T&C page? Since the data we are
using is supplied by another institution I've been asked to replace the logo.
Would having more logos (keeping openlink and adding another) be an iss
Hello Rumi,
Thanks for the info, can you point me to some T&C page? Since the data we are
using is supplied by another institution I've been asked to replace the logo.
Would having more logos (keeping openlink and adding another) be an issue?
Thanks
--
Nuno Lopes
On 12 Mar 2013, at 22:49, R
Hello Nuno,
On 12-Mar-13 11:13 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello Rumi,
Thanks for the info. Should have been more clear, sorry. I was hoping to
replace the openlink logo or somehow change the default look we get from
'about/html/http/..', similar to:
http://demo.openlinksw.com/Northwind/Customer
Hello Rumi,
Thanks for the info. Should have been more clear, sorry. I was hoping to
replace the openlink logo or somehow change the default look we get from
'about/html/http/..', similar to:
http://demo.openlinksw.com/Northwind/Customer/ALFKI
Thanks
--
Nuno Lopes
On 12 Mar 2013, at 20:15
Hello Nuno,
On 12-Mar-13 5:41 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello all,
I have a virtuoso open-source instance running and I'd like to customise the
RDF visualisation. These would be simple changes like a different logo or some
css tweaks.
Is it possible to do this while still using the off-the-shel
Hello all,
I have a virtuoso open-source instance running and I'd like to customise the
RDF visualisation. These would be simple changes like a different logo or some
css tweaks.
Is it possible to do this while still using the off-the-shelf rdf_mappers vad?
I've been looking around the ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
