Re: [Virtuoso-users] base for prefixes

Eric, I've got. BASE is considered in both cases, but BASE is not a concatenation, it's resolving according to RFC 1808 so resolved with gives , not

Re: [Virtuoso-users] base for prefixes

Hi Hugh, the version we're running for this particular instance is 5.0.5 (Linux 64bits). You can check it out from: http://www.cellcycleontology.org/query/sparql I have run 'explain' with the following query: BASE PREFIX rdfs:

Re: [Virtuoso-users] base for prefixes

Hi Ward, I have tested this in-house and the base keyword does return the same/ correct results for me: SQL> sparql base select count(*) from <> where {?s ?p ?o} ; callret-0 INTEGER

[Virtuoso-users] base for prefixes

Dear Virtuoso users, I was wondering whether the keyword 'base' to make prefixes shorter is working in Virtuoso. It didn't give my a compile error when I use it, but it doesn't give any answers to my query either. I used it like this: base prefix rdf:<