Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

Hi Alex, In what way are the queries you provided not working ? I have loaded the datasets you provided and get the following: SQL> sparql select * from where {?s ?p ?o};s p

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

Hi Hugh, I attach you a test case and some queries. Please inform me about the result or the appropriate query to get the right results. On 27 March 2012 18:50, Hugh Williams wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Are you able to provide a simple test case we can try locally to see this > problem ? > > Best Re

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

Hi Alex, Are you able to provide a simple test case we can try locally to see this problem ? Best Regards Hugh Williams Professional Services OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ 10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803 Weblog -- http://www.ope

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

Hello Hugh, yes I am aware of that. The problem is not with the predicate. That was just an example of a < relation. You can use any predicate to represent this relation. The problem, I think, is with the evaluation of transitivity followed by a filter which is applied on the inferred property in

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

Hi Alex, Have you reviewed the Virtuoso transitivity documentation at: http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparqlrule.html#rdfsparqlruletransoption which requires the use of the “rdfs:subClassOf” predicate to enable the built in support for RDF Schema subclasses ? Best Regards Hugh

[Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

Hello everyone, In brief my problem is with a transitive query applied on a poset to get the maximal elements of a node. So assume that we have the following example with subclasses: b subclass of a c subclass of a d subclass of b e subclass of d e subclass of f The maximal classes are not