Pierre,
>
> Regarding limit 1 offset 2, I am not sure I fully understand what you
> mean.
>
>
> For me:
>
>
> limit 1 => first row
> limit 1 offset 0 => first row
> limit 1 offset 1 => first row
> limit 1 offset 2 => second row
offset N means 'skip N first rows'. So correct list of cases is
Hi Ivan,
Thanks a lot for your great support and for those fixes. BTW, when do you
plan to announce the official VOS 5.0.4?
Regarding limit 1 offset 2, I am not sure I fully understand what you mean.
For me:
limit 1 => first row
limit 1 offset 0 => first row
limit 1 offset 1 => first row
limit 1
Hello Pierre,
All 4 queries are now fixed in commercial version of Virtuoso and fixes
are on their way to the Virtuoso Open Source snapshot.
The only note is that
> sparql select distinct ?g where {graph ?g {?s ?p ?o}} order by (?g)
> limit 1 offset 2;
should actually return nothing.
http://www
Hello Pierre,
Oops, this is a real bug; it seemes to me that VOS 5.0.5 will happen
earlier than expected. Thank you for this report.
Best Regards,
Ivan Mikhailov,
OpenLink Software.
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:23 +0100, Pierre De Wilde wrote:
> After a fresh installation of VOS 5.0.4, I ran the fol
After a fresh installation of VOS 5.0.4, I ran the following queries:
1. OK
sparql select distinct ?g where {graph ?g {?s ?p ?o}} order by (?g);
Result:
http://localhost:8890/DAV
http://www.openlinksw.com/schemas/virtrdf#
2. NOK: name is repeated
sparql select ?g count(?g) where {graph ?g {?s ?p
