On 07/01/2011 14:57, Matthew Tedder wrote:
Thanks for your kind words :)
> That said, no software is ever perfect. To me, the clearest inhibitive
> factor to popular adoption is the documentation. It's not horrible but could
> be made much better organized, more explicit, and complete (not that
On 10.01.11 14:22, Yrjana Rankka wrote:
> There's a RunAs = directive in Parameters section of virtuoso.ini
>
> This will make virtuoso change its euid post creating listeners in
> (possibly privileged) ports, etc.
oh didn't know that, thanks for the hint!
cu
Adrian
On 1/7/11 16:25 , Adrian Gschwend wrote:
On 07.01.11 15:57, Matthew Tedder wrote:
Also, on UNIX, the default install is not FHS compliant but easily
fixed.
btw one thing I forgot on Unix: If I'm right the only way to run it on a
port below 1024 is to run it as root. This is not
On 07.01.11 15:57, Matthew Tedder wrote:
> That said, no software is ever perfect. To me, the clearest inhibitive
> factor to popular adoption is the documentation. It's not horrible but could
> be made much better organized, more explicit, and complete (not that it
> should be too wordy, either
On 07.01.11 15:57, Matthew Tedder wrote:
> Also, on UNIX, the default install is not FHS compliant but easily
> fixed.
btw one thing I forgot on Unix: If I'm right the only way to run it on a
port below 1024 is to run it as root. This is not really the way to go
and popular daemon
On 1/7/11 9:57 AM, Matthew Tedder wrote:
I just want to say, I am so far just very very impressed with Virtuoso all
around--in so many respects. The SQL is easy to work with, the web-based
tools are great. The feature set, such as semantic web and xml support are
just extraordinary. I haven't
I just want to say, I am so far just very very impressed with Virtuoso all
around--in so many respects. The SQL is easy to work with, the web-based
tools are great. The feature set, such as semantic web and xml support are
just extraordinary. I haven't tried the Jena interface, but I'd like to l
