Re: [Virtuoso-users] Pseudo-Federated SPARQL

2010-06-19 Thread Aldo Bucchi
Hehe I just asked this very same question again. Any news on this one? On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Aldo Bucchi wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Sorry for the delay, I got back to this just today. > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Ivan Mikhailov > wrote: >> Hello Aldo, >> >> 1. >> Maybe http://docs.op

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Pseudo-Federated SPARQL

2009-10-09 Thread Aldo Bucchi
Hi Ivan, Sorry for the delay, I got back to this just today. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Ivan Mikhailov wrote: > Hello Aldo, > > 1. > Maybe http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_sparql_rexec.html will help > you to some degree? "some" being the key word here ;) > 2. > We're experimenting

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Pseudo-Federated SPARQL

2009-10-05 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Hello Aldo, 1. Maybe http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_sparql_rexec.html will help you to some degree? 2. We're experimenting with SPARQL federation already, but right nowit sometimes fails even if Virtuoso sends a federated query to itself :) Anyway, sooner or later that will work better and

[Virtuoso-users] Pseudo-Federated SPARQL

2009-10-05 Thread Aldo Bucchi
Hi, I find myself in a situation where I want to issue SPARQL queries to a certain endpoint ( linkeddata.uriburner.com/sparql ), but I want to use procedures, inference rules, and other magic to avoid bloating my client side code. Unfrortunately I cannot install these procedures in the target inst