On 5/5/12 6:31 AM, Alex wrote:
Hello,
I have managed to isolate the problem and I have an indicative schema
and some java code for generating some triples.
Tell me where I can send them. Please respond to me asap. Thanks.
We just need triples and schema.
You can send to supp...@openlinksw.com
Hello,
I have managed to isolate the problem and I have an indicative schema
and some java code for generating some triples.
Tell me where I can send them. Please respond to me asap. Thanks.
On 4 May 2012 16:53, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 5/4/12 9:08 AM, Alex wrote:
>>
>> Thanks I will try that
On 5/4/12 9:08 AM, Alex wrote:
Thanks I will try that. Though with a quick view I didn't understand it. Are
there any instance data stored? Which graphs are already stored?
Again I get errors searching for graphs using
http://demo.openlinksw.com/isparql/:
Virtuoso . Error SQ200: Query too l
Thanks I will try that. Though with a quick view I didn't understand it. Are
there any instance data stored? Which graphs are already stored?
Again I get errors searching for graphs using
http://demo.openlinksw.com/isparql/:
Virtuoso . Error SQ200: Query too large, more than 65000 variables i
On 5/3/12 1:08 PM, Hugh Williams wrote:
Hi Alex,
Are you able to provide some sample data for the inference rule you
are creating and the datasets it is being applied against so we can
follow a set of steps to recreate this problem in-house ? Or if you
can recreate on one of our public SPARQ
Hi Alex,
Are you able to provide some sample data for the inference rule you are
creating and the datasets it is being applied against so we can follow a set of
steps to recreate this problem in-house ? Or if you can recreate on one of our
public SPARQL endpoints that would be helpful also as
On 5/3/12 10:19 AM, Alex wrote:
Hello,
so the referred problem also exists in the 6.1.5 version.
This time I tried the following queries w.r.t Sparql 1.1:
sparql define input:inference insert {graph{
?p ?o}} using where{ ?p ?o}; (1)
sparql define input:inference insert {graph{?s ?p
?o}} usi
Hello,
so the referred problem also exists in the 6.1.5 version.
This time I tried the following queries w.r.t Sparql 1.1:
sparql define input:inference insert {graph {
?p ?o}} using where{ ?p ?o}; (1)
sparql define input:inference insert {graph {?s ?p
?o}} using where{?s ?p ?o}; (2)
Using the
On 4/27/12 10:18 AM, Alex wrote:
Thank you for your support.
Two more things to take into consideration on the previous statistics.
Even though the total number of triples in and might be 8
and that there is 1 class instance in both graphs this does not mean
that the triples are the same in
Thank you for your support.
Two more things to take into consideration on the previous statistics.
Even though the total number of triples in and might be 8
and that there is 1 class instance in both graphs this does not mean
that the triples are the same in and ,
e.g., the triple ( rdf:type ?
On 4/27/12 9:31 AM, Alex wrote:
Yes rdfs schema.
15 is the total number of triples including both the inferred and the
explicit ones from.
Okay, I am going to hand this over to our support team to see if they
can recreate based on the information in this post. Naturally, you have
to bear wit
Yes rdfs schema.
15 is the total number of triples including both the inferred and the
explicit ones from .
On 27 April 2012 15:45, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 4/27/12 8:36 AM, Alex wrote:
>>
>> I can give you some statistics if this is helpful.
>>
>> Number of triples in: 152329
>> Number of tr
On 4/27/12 8:36 AM, Alex wrote:
I can give you some statistics if this is helpful.
Number of triples in: 152329
Number of triples with subject in: 8
Number of triples with subject in : 8
Number of triples applying rdfs on triples with subject in: 15
I assume you are using rdfs schema for y
I can give you some statistics if this is helpful.
Number of triples in : 152329
Number of triples with subject in : 8
Number of triples with subject in : 8
Number of triples applying rdfs on triples with subject in : 15
sparql define input:inference select count(*) from
where{?s ?p ?o} : 15
On 4/27/12 7:35 AM, Alex wrote:
Following the Carina's advice:
shutdown()
change value of parameter "ResultSetMaxRows" in the .ini file to
1000
save
sudo virtuoso-t -f&
sudo isql-vt
Applying again the rule, I get same the wrong behavior: inference only
on the results to the correct
Following the Carina's advice:
shutdown()
change value of parameter "ResultSetMaxRows" in the .ini file to
1000
save
sudo virtuoso-t -f &
sudo isql-vt
Applying again the rule, I get same the wrong behavior: inference only
on the results to the correct inferred triples, but not in the
On 4/27/12 6:57 AM, Carina Haupt wrote:
On 27.04.2012 12:14, Alex wrote:
Hello again,
my scenario is the following: given a graph with some triples
apply a rule set based on a schema and insert the inferred triples to
another graphs.
So I use the following query to accomplish that:
sparql d
On 27.04.2012 12:14, Alex wrote:
Hello again,
my scenario is the following: given a graph with some triples
apply a rule set based on a schema and insert the inferred triples to
another graphs.
So I use the following query to accomplish that:
sparql define input:inference insert into {?s ?
Hello again,
my scenario is the following: given a graph with some triples
apply a rule set based on a schema and insert the inferred triples to
another graphs .
So I use the following query to accomplish that:
sparql define input:inference insert into {?s ?p
?o} where{graph {?s ?p ?o}} (1)
19 matches
Mail list logo
