On 7/31/13 8:33 AM, Jim McCusker wrote:
Can you explain how SPARQL construct queries can be chained together
as in forward chaining? I'm interested in doing something like that.
You can use SPARQL 1.1 to for this pipeline with the end product ending
up in a name graph of your choosing.
Templ
Can you explain how SPARQL construct queries can be chained together as in
forward chaining? I'm interested in doing something like that.
Thanks,
Jim
On Wednesday, July 31, 2013, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 7/31/13 7:29 AM, Hugh Williams wrote:
>
> Hi Kayhan,
>
> Virtuoso rule sets for setting
On 7/31/13 7:29 AM, Hugh Williams wrote:
Hi Kayhan,
Virtuoso rule sets for setting up inference and reasoning can be setup
as detailed at:
http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparqlrule.html
What we are missing right now is a custom rules (via views) feature that
basically amounts to a
Hi Kayhan,
Virtuoso rule sets for setting up inference and reasoning can be setup as
detailed at:
http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparqlrule.html
Best Regards
Hugh Williams
Professional Services
OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
Weblog -- h
Hello,
we are trying to do some OWL reasoning based on owl:propertyChainAxiom.
Since that predicate is not supported, is there a way to define external rules,
so that the built-in reasoner can use them?
Regards
Kayhan Uludemirciler
Softwareentwicklung
SOHARD Software GmbH
Würzburger Str. 19
Hello!
Virtuoso 6.1 contains some new OWL semantics support. And it makes me happy
:)
But at the moment I do not understand how OWL semantics is integrated into
Virtuoso (primarily RDFS) reasoner. Some questions:
1. What about things like owl:Thing, owl:Nothing, owl:TopDataProperty,
owl:BottomData
