Re: [Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache

2014-02-20 Thread Timothy Lebo
Kingsley, Thanks for the background on how things are added manually when they hit your radar, for verifying that the default graph is the union, and for the pointer to adding inference. I’ll go have fun playing with the cache now :-) Regards, Tim On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Kingsley Idehen

Re: [Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache

2014-02-20 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 2/20/14 2:44 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: Virtuoso, I’m using the LOD Cloud Cache [1] as a sample of the LOD Cloud, and wanted to make sure that I was using it to its full potential. Thanks for such a useful resource. Could you comment on the following? A) What portion of Linked Data is in the

[Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache

2014-02-20 Thread Timothy Lebo
Virtuoso, I’m using the LOD Cloud Cache [1] as a sample of the LOD Cloud, and wanted to make sure that I was using it to its full potential. Thanks for such a useful resource. Could you comment on the following? A) What portion of Linked Data is in the cache? i.e., what methodology is used to l

Re: [Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache Stats

2011-04-06 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 4/5/11 7:45 PM, Juan Sequeda wrote: On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Kingsley Idehen mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com>> wrote: All, I've knocked up a Google spreadsheet that contains stats about our 21 Billion Triples+ LOD cloud cache. On the issue of Triple Counts, you can't

Re: [Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache Stats

2011-04-05 Thread Juan Sequeda
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > All, > > I've knocked up a Google spreadsheet that contains stats about our 21 > Billion Triples+ LOD cloud cache. > > On the issue of Triple Counts, you can't make sense of Data if you can't > count it. We can't depend on SPARQL-FED for dis

Re: [Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache Stats

2011-04-05 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 4/5/11 4:17 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > It just makes > the data a couple of orders of magnitude bigger and a few > more orders of magnitude more cumbersome to deal with. Yes and No. As will all of these matter utility lies in the eyes and fingers of the data beholder. *Typo fix edition

Re: [Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache Stats

2011-04-05 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 4/5/11 3:42 PM, William Waites wrote: So I don't have answers to your questions, but do have some observations about the results, particularly the counts of distinct predicates. The top one is rdf:type which makes sense. Below that we have ones used in reification. Who knew there was actually

Re: [Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache Stats

2011-04-05 Thread William Waites
So I don't have answers to your questions, but do have some observations about the results, particularly the counts of distinct predicates. The top one is rdf:type which makes sense. Below that we have ones used in reification. Who knew there was actually that much reified data out there? I wond

[Virtuoso-users] LOD Cloud Cache Stats

2011-04-02 Thread Kingsley Idehen
All, I've knocked up a Google spreadsheet that contains stats about our 21 Billion Triples+ LOD cloud cache. On the issue of Triple Counts, you can't make sense of Data if you can't count it. We can't depend on SPARQL-FED for distributed queries, and we absolutely cannot depend on a Web craw