Re: [Virtuoso-users] Calling Sponger cartridge with options from sparql select

Hello Peter, Unexpected "more than one resultset" usually means that some procedure called inside sql:myfunc uses functions result_names() ... result() ... end_result(), as in http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_result_names.html etc. As a result, the generated result set is put into receiver -

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Calling Sponger cartridge with options from sparql select

Hi Ivan, I've played around a bit with function calls within a SPARQL query. I have the following format: select * from where { ?s ?p ?o filter(sql:myfunc(arg1, arg2, arg3)) } myfunc() does some processing on the arguments, calls another function and ultimately returns 1. I'l

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Calling Sponger cartridge with options from sparql select

Hello Peter, Unfortunately there's no good way to pass the parameters you need. You may cheat and make your version of cartridge that will use connection_get() [1] to obtain connection variable assigned before by connection_set() [2], but that's not universal and looks bad. You may also write you

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Calling Sponger cartridge with options from sparql select

Hi everyone, I'm still trying to figure out how to supply parameters/options to a sparql select eg: sparql select * from where { ?s ?p ?o } I can set options in the Sponger cartridge definition via Conductor but I really need a way to pass parameters eg to change the

[Virtuoso-users] Calling Sponger cartridge with options from sparql select

Hi everyone, I'm trying to figure out how to supply the opts value (inout opts any, defined in sponger hook) as part of a sparql select. Without the options a sponger call (for instance to csv cartridge) can be made as: sparql select * from where {?o ?p ?s}