Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
Kingsley --
This is the snippet that I think needs revision, from the
virtuoso-users list --
* On Feb 5, 2010, at 05:59 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
** Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
i also realized that you put A- and T-box in one graph - is this
optional or a must?
optiona
Kingsley --
This is the snippet that I think needs revision, from the
virtuoso-users list --
* On Feb 5, 2010, at 05:59 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
** Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
i also realized that you put A- and T-box in one graph - is this
optional or a must?
optional, but my preferred style
;reasoner', 'urn:reasonertest');
i'll have a test with the relationship data on my server and report back this
evening.
thank you very much for your help!
wkr turnguard
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Mikhailov"
To: "Jürgen Jakobitsch"
Cc: "
onertest');
i'll have a test with the relationship data on my server and report back this
evening.
thank you very much for your help!
wkr turnguard
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Mikhailov"
To: "Jürgen Jakobitsch"
Cc: "Kingsley Idehen" ,
virtuo
Hello Jürgen,
owl:TransitiveProperty inference is enabled only if triple pattern
contains fixed transitive P. It does not work With variable ?p so the
option T_DISTINCT becomes misleading.
Best Regards,
Ivan Mikhailov
OpenLink Software
http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 23:42
Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
hi kingsley, arigato gozaimasu, so far,
now these queries look really promising on http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql.
but with
./virtuoso-t -?
Virtuoso Open Source Edition (multi threaded)
Version 6.1.0.3126-pthreads as of Feb 4 2010
Compiled for Linux (i686-pc-linux
hi kingsley, arigato gozaimasu, so far,
now these queries look really promising on http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql.
but with
./virtuoso-t -?
Virtuoso Open Source Edition (multi threaded)
Version 6.1.0.3126-pthreads as of Feb 4 2010
Compiled for Linux (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 1998-201
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
Just realized the last owl:inverseOf query is incorrect. It should be:
## Test owl:inverseOf Reasoning
## Should show triples exposing the inverseOf relation.
## In this case rel:employedBy instance data triples exist, the system
must infer r
