Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-09 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Hello Erich, Sorry I did not notice your last mails at time. The last builds work fine for me and the code for this specific case is stable for almost two years (so Oct 26 2012 build should work as well). So maybe update is the simplest solution and I will check one more time what was wrong as lat

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-09 Thread David Brooks
Hi Erich, I suspect you will find 6.1.6 supports application/x-turtle -- I recall similar issues when I first started using Virtuoso. Best regards, Dave On 10/04/13 12:45 PM, Erich Bremer wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > I have it set as text/turtle. Hugh said it works fine in the pre > 6.1.7 (whe

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-09 Thread Erich Bremer
Hi Ivan, I have it set as text/turtle. Hugh said it works fine in the pre 6.1.7 (where it doesn't work in 6.1.6), the work-around is easy for now until I can upgrade to 6.1.7. I had never noticed before since everything I had done to date had at least one prefix defined at the top of th

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-09 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Hello Erich, Was the MIME type of the file properly specified in request by the client? If it's specified as some default like "text/plain" or not specified at all then the server tries to guess the MIME by looking at keywords and/or XML structure. I guess that @prefix worked as a hint to understa

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-09 Thread Erich Bremer
Ah ok, so it was fixed. I was using the latest version from Source Forge - 6.1.6. Is there going to be a new release version? If 7 ready for prime time? - Erich On 4/9/2013 9:48 AM, Hugh Williams wrote: Hi Erich, Your build is from the stable/6 github branch, you need to build with the

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-09 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Erich, Your build is from the stable/6 github branch, you need to build with the latest develop/6 branch which were my build was made from ... Best Regards Hugh Williams Professional Services OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ Weblog -- http://www.open

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-09 Thread Erich Bremer
Hi Hugh, virtuoso-t -? Virtuoso Open Source Edition (multi threaded) Version 6.1.6.3127-pthreads as of Oct 26 2012 Compiled for Linux (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1998-2012 OpenLink Software The command I use is: curl -v -T single.ttl -H Content-type:text/turtle http://localhost:88

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-08 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Eric, Please provide the specific command and complete output being returned, as if I perform the upload of the "single.ttl" file you provide using the /sparql-graph-crud upload method as you provide in one of your examples back in January, then it uploads fine for me against the latest ope

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-08 Thread Erich Bremer
Hi Hugh, Yes, the first file is "single.ttl" containing the one line: a . The second file is "s2.ttl" containing two lines: @prefix foaf: . a . The first file fails with the error me

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Erich, Are you able to provide a sample sparql-graph-crud upload query showing this problem ? Best Regards Hugh Williams Professional Services OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/ LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.c

[Virtuoso-users] Bug in Graph Store HTTP protocol turtle uploads

2013-04-07 Thread Erich Bremer
When trying to upload data to sparql-graph-crud, the upload will fail if there are no PREFIX statements at the top of the file even though no prefixes are used anywhere in the turtle document. The upload appears to succeed if any "@prefix" statement is added to the top of the file (even though