Re: [Virtuoso-users] Problem related to triples deletion when a literal has no language.

2010-02-22 Thread Ricardo Z
p > o > VARCHAR > VARCHAR > VARCHAR > > ___ > > > 0 Rows. -- 1 msec. > SQL> > > So a fix will be available in the next release due out soon, or I can > pos

[Virtuoso-users] Problem related to triples deletion when a literal has no language.

2010-02-22 Thread Ricardo Z
Hi. We are having some problems related to triples deletion when the object is a literal string with no language. (We are using virtuoso 6.1.0.3126) As an example consider the following. We clear the graph, them we insert a triple, we query the graph and we obtain the triple. Following we delete

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Problem with virtuoso procedure in a sparql query.

2010-02-11 Thread Ricardo Z
Hi We've installed installed virtuoso 6.1. One of the new features on the list is Added support for expressions in LIMIT and OFFSET clauses So we tried to write again this query inside of a for in a virtuoso procedure. sparql select distinct ?documentId ?title ?abstract ?title_relevance

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Does Virtuoso HTTP Proxy play along with HTTP Delete ( the Verb )

2010-01-21 Thread Ricardo Z
Related to HTTP methods. There is any way when you publish a procedure through http tell the allow http method POST GET UPDATE DELETE lik?e: DB.DBA.VHOST_DEFINE ( lpath=>'/http_procedure', method=>'GET' ppath => '/!get_procedure/', is_dav => 1, vsp_user => 'dba', opts => ve

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Problem with virtuoso procedure in a sparql query.

2010-01-21 Thread Ricardo Z
Hi Ivan. Thanks for the quick response. So the problem is related to the sparql expresions parser. I think the change of the rule of this parser it should be consistent with the definition of the others elements on the sparql expresion in order to obtain a coherent behaviour. For example, I thin

[Virtuoso-users] Problem with virtuoso procedure in a sparql query.

2010-01-20 Thread Ricardo Z
Hi. We are embedding a sparql query into a for of virtuoso procedure. Everything works great if we do the following. Focus on the value of the offset: ... for(sparql select distinct ?documentId ?title ?abstract ?relevance ?classification from where { ?do