Re: [Virtuoso-users] increase group_concat size

2016-11-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Roland, Unfortunately that limit can't be change as it's at the very base levels of the runtime, development indicate. What is the use case you have that requires such a large GROUP_CONCAT size ? Best Regards Hugh Williams Professional Services OpenLink Software, Inc. // h

[Virtuoso-users] increase group_concat size

2016-11-07 Thread Roland Cornelissen
Him Is it possible to (temporarily) increase the maximum GROUP_CONCAT size? Someting like this: |SETSESSION group_concat_max_len =100;| I run into this error when using GROUP_CONCAT: *** Error 22023: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SR578: The expected result length of string concatena

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar

2016-11-07 Thread Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]
Idehen/Hugh/Sergei, I did my own research on this. OpenLink wrote the initial virt_jena.jar driver, and maintains it, but does not enhance it. Sorry for the dumb questions - I can check this stuff on github.com, but sometimes a conversation is a good thing. Sergei, https://github.com/smalini

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar

2016-11-07 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 11/7/16 10:55 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote: > > Who is maintaining virt-jena? What is the process of maintaining > this, e.g. is this portion of virtuoso purely contributed, or does > OpenLink plan to update it and maintain it. > > > > My application depends on virt-jena. I will

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar

2016-11-07 Thread Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]
Ah, I see, there's a binsrc/jena, binsrc/jena2, and binsrc/jena3. I will look at the commits to this and try to answer my question on my own. It would be nice to hear clearly what the commitment of OpenLink is to this. From: Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:55 AM T

[Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar

2016-11-07 Thread Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]
Who is maintaining virt-jena? What is the process of maintaining this, e.g. is this portion of virtuoso purely contributed, or does OpenLink plan to update it and maintain it. My application depends on virt-jena. I will need to tell my boss where an upgrade to virt-jena is in an OpenLink road

Re: [Virtuoso-users] [VOS7] Text Search

2016-11-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi What happens if you just remove the resource type triple pattern ? As rdf:type is very expensive due to its nature, as in RDF_QUAD table you are going to have many members (or participants) in the rdf:type relation that have to be evaluated whenever its used in a query, hence the overhead.

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Query performance with R2RML remote RDBMS SQL Server

2016-11-07 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 11/4/16 8:56 AM, CHARBEL EL KAED wrote: > > Thank you Kingsley, > > > > Is there an approximate date for the patch? > We can get it to you in about a week or less. Your case will be updated accordingly. Kingsley > > Thank you, > > Best/Cordialement, > > Charbel El Kaed, PhD > Business Archite

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Query performance with R2RML remote RDBMS SQL Server

2016-11-07 Thread CHARBEL EL KAED
Thank you Kingsley, Is there an approximate date for the patch? Thank you, Best/Cordialement, Charbel El Kaed, PhD Business Architect Digital Services Platform Global Solutions Schneider Electric D +1 (978) 975-9361 x59361 M +1 (978) 289-3190 E charbel.el-k...@schneider-electric.com