Re: [Virtuoso-users] Optional and Literals have different behavior in two instance of virtuoso.

2013-01-18 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Marcelo, Hmmm, if your sysadmin policy is only to install packages from the official CentOS repository(s) on the production systems , then you have a problem in that you have to wait for them to upgrade there repositories which will probably only be for there next scheduled release. We do

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Official binary builds

2013-01-18 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
On 18.01.2013, at 19:43, Hugh Williams wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > We are currently discussing how best this can be done for this common Linux > distro's, but as it stands they would have to be build from source, for which > we do provide instructions on building for popular Linux distros in ther

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Official binary builds

2013-01-18 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Alexey, We are currently discussing how best this can be done for this common Linux distro's, but as it stands they would have to be build from source, for which we do provide instructions on building for popular Linux distros in there packaging formats etc as detailed at: http://v

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Optional and Literals have different behavior in two instance of virtuoso.

2013-01-18 Thread Marcelo Aliquintuy
Hi Hugh. Yes the build dates are different because the production virtuoso is from Centos repository and Dev virtuoso is compiled from sourceforge source. Well I request to the sysadmin upgrade virtuoso but that is the last version available. And production environment allows only packages from c

[Virtuoso-users] Official binary builds

2013-01-18 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
Hi There were several related topics on the list, lately, so I decided to ask. Would OpenLink be able to provide official binary builds for main production linux distributions? I think, the list would consist of: * RHEL/CentOS (EPEL has package for 6.1.2) * Debian Stable (ships with 6.1.2) *