Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

2012-03-27 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Alex, Are you able to provide a simple test case we can try locally to see this problem ? Best Regards Hugh Williams Professional Services OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ 10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803 Weblog -- http://www.ope

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

2012-03-27 Thread Alex
Hello Hugh, yes I am aware of that. The problem is not with the predicate. That was just an example of a < relation. You can use any predicate to represent this relation. The problem, I think, is with the evaluation of transitivity followed by a filter which is applied on the inferred property in

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Transitivity query - Poset maximal elements

2012-03-27 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Alex, Have you reviewed the Virtuoso transitivity documentation at: http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparqlrule.html#rdfsparqlruletransoption which requires the use of the “rdfs:subClassOf” predicate to enable the built in support for RDF Schema subclasses ? Best Regards Hugh