On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> All,
>
> I've knocked up a Google spreadsheet that contains stats about our 21
> Billion Triples+ LOD cloud cache.
>
> On the issue of Triple Counts, you can't make sense of Data if you can't
> count it. We can't depend on SPARQL-FED for dis
On 4/5/11 4:17 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> It just makes
> the data a couple of orders of magnitude bigger and a few
> more orders of magnitude more cumbersome to deal with.
Yes and No. As will all of these matter utility lies in the eyes and
fingers of the data beholder.
*Typo fix edition
On 4/5/11 3:42 PM, William Waites wrote:
So I don't have answers to your questions, but do have some
observations about the results, particularly the counts of
distinct predicates.
The top one is rdf:type which makes sense. Below that we
have ones used in reification. Who knew there was actually
So I don't have answers to your questions, but do have some
observations about the results, particularly the counts of
distinct predicates.
The top one is rdf:type which makes sense. Below that we
have ones used in reification. Who knew there was actually
that much reified data out there? I wond
All,
Following the initial spreadsheet covering stats for our LOD Cloud Cache
instance [1], here are similar stats for our URIBurner.com instance [2].
Links:
1.
https://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?hl=en&key=tub0WHafqXO9zsdDrpeuxqw&hl=en
-- LOD Cloud Cache
2.
https://spreadsheets.google.
On 4/5/11 8:10 AM, Aleksandr A. Zaripov wrote:
> Hi, All.
>
> Is there any way to get the list of rulesets (created by rdfs_rule_set
> function) and associated graphs?
> Thanks.
> Alexander A. Zaripov
> zari...@tpu.ru
>
>
> -
Hi, All.
Is there any way to get the list of rulesets (created by rdfs_rule_set
function) and associated graphs?
Thanks.
Alexander A. Zaripov
zari...@tpu.ru