[Virtuoso-users] How to use inference rule in two graphs ?

2011-01-10 Thread Renan Moreira de Oliveira
Hi Aldo and Virtuoso Users How are you? I want to use an inference rule which has the two graphs in its range, or rather, I will explain the problem: Previously, we had a graph for everything. Now, we are moving to a world where there will be several graphs to separate the contexts of business. W

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Really Impressed with Virtuoso All Around..

2011-01-10 Thread Adrian Gschwend
On 10.01.11 14:22, Yrjana Rankka wrote: > There's a RunAs = directive in Parameters section of virtuoso.ini > > This will make virtuoso change its euid post creating listeners in > (possibly privileged) ports, etc. oh didn't know that, thanks for the hint! cu Adrian

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Query comparison

2011-01-10 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Hello Sebastian, It's hard to diagnose without dumps of EXPLAINs of these queries. Most probably, the last triple pattern has been moved toward the leading position because the selectivity of the fixed object variant was overestimated. You can try to check variants that restrict graphs, if that is

[Virtuoso-users] Query comparison

2011-01-10 Thread Sebastian TrĂ¼g
Hi list, again I have a question about query performance: why is there a big difference in query execution time between select distinct ?r ?v where { { ?r ?v1 ?v2 . FILTER(bif:contains(?v2, "'hello' AND 'world'")) . } UNION { ?r ?v1 ?v3 . ?v3 ?v4 ?v2 . ?v4 rdfs:subPropertyOf r

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Really Impressed with Virtuoso All Around..

2011-01-10 Thread Yrjana Rankka
On 1/7/11 16:25 , Adrian Gschwend wrote: On 07.01.11 15:57, Matthew Tedder wrote: Also, on UNIX, the default install is not FHS compliant but easily fixed. btw one thing I forgot on Unix: If I'm right the only way to run it on a port below 1024 is to run it as root. This is not