Hello Frode,
The difference means that the optimizer overestimated the selectivity of
the new triple pattern and placed it before free-text. There are two
typical fixes for such cases: an accurate one and a "dirty hack".
The accurate is possible if you know that some of triples in question
are al
On 26/08/2010 16:08, Camila Dias wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> How can i see how many triples per day i have?
Hi,
It rather depends what you mean.
I expect the key query is
select count(*) from rdf_quad;
and then it's up to you how you'd like it presented:
a) use the scheduler to make things h
On 19/08/2010 14:04, Aldo Bucchi wrote:
> Is there a way to enable logs for all SPARQL queries hitting an endpoint?
Hi,
One option that comes to mind:
virtuoso.ini
[HTTPServer]
HTTPLogFile=somefile
(More at http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/dbadm.html)
HTH,
~Tim
--
Tim Haynes
Product Deve
On 12/07/2010 23:08, Peter DeVries wrote:
> I decided to try to do the source install of the latest version of Virtuoso
> Open Source on Ubuntu Lucid.
>
> * This is different than installing *virtuoso-opensource* via the package
> manager.
>
> Following the default configuration using default pat
I am preparing for an upgrade to Virtuoso 6.1.2, and during testing I
see that two almost identical queries give very different response time
- the one with an extra restriction takes a lot longer(!) to complete.
At http://msoneutv.computas.no:8890/sparql >, copy&pasting the
following query gives
On 13.9.2010 18:19, Hugh Williams wrote:
Hi Florian,
You mentioning trying two approaches to dumping the data but only provide
details of one below, what is the other method you tried and did this work ?
The other approach I tried for dumping data used the RDF_QM_TREE_DUMP
procedure, with thi
