Re: [Virtuoso-users] SPARQL IN() performance issues w/ 6.1

2010-02-09 Thread Nathan
Nathan wrote: > Nathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm pretty sure that the performance of in() seems to have downgraded >> somewhat with the new 6.1.0.3126 release of virtuoso; I'm struggling to >> run even very simple queries such as the following without them timing >> out, on both my own 6.1 and dbpedi

Re: [Virtuoso-users] SPARQL IN() performance issues w/ 6.1

2010-02-09 Thread Nathan
Nathan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm pretty sure that the performance of in() seems to have downgraded > somewhat with the new 6.1.0.3126 release of virtuoso; I'm struggling to > run even very simple queries such as the following without them timing > out, on both my own 6.1 and dbpedia.org's instance: >

[Virtuoso-users] SPARQL IN() performance issues w/ 6.1

2010-02-09 Thread Nathan
Hi, I'm pretty sure that the performance of in() seems to have downgraded somewhat with the new 6.1.0.3126 release of virtuoso; I'm struggling to run even very simple queries such as the following without them timing out, on both my own 6.1 and dbpedia.org's instance: SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o .

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in SPARQL XML results

2010-02-09 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Hello Alexander, > The resulting XML has this two problems: > > 1) > It says that distinct is false, but according to my query it should be true. Unfortunately the header is always the same. The reason is that the order is fixed for constant data due to the nature of SQL database and it's

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Force ForwardChaining

2010-02-09 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: hi, i'm just reading here http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Virtuoso that forward-chaining may be forced, which sounds great. is there some doc on how to do that or am i something getting wrong? wkr turnguard You can force constrained forward-chaining via SPARQL CONST

[Virtuoso-users] Force ForwardChaining

2010-02-09 Thread Jürgen Jakobitsch
hi, i'm just reading here http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Virtuoso that forward-chaining may be forced, which sounds great. is there some doc on how to do that or am i something getting wrong? wkr turnguard -- punkt. netServices __ Jürgen Jakobitsch Codeography Lerc

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Bug in SPARQL XML results

2010-02-09 Thread Nathan
fyi just done some quick checks and: Alexander De Leon wrote: > Hi, > This is possible a bug in Version: 06.00.3123 > > My endpoint is http://bio2rdf.semanticscience.org:8002/sparql > > If you run the following query: > > select distinct * where { ?p ?o } >