[Virtuoso-users] Bug in SPARQL XML results

2010-02-08 Thread Alexander De Leon
Hi, This is possible a bug in Version: 06.00.3123 My endpoint is http://bio2rdf.semanticscience.org:8002/sparql If you run the following query: select distinct * where { ?p ?o } and ask for results in XML. The resulting XML has this two problems: 1)

Re: [Virtuoso-users] SNORQL SPARQL query BOUND() problem

2010-02-08 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Egon, The fix will appear in the next release. Meanwhile you may use the attached patch, it should be applicable to all recent versions of v5 and v6 (with some line offset). Sorry for inconvenience, Ivan Mikhailov OpenLink Software http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 12:08 +010

Re: [Virtuoso-users] CORRECTION 6.1 owl support

2010-02-08 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote: Kingsley -- This is the snippet that I think needs revision, from the virtuoso-users list -- * On Feb 5, 2010, at 05:59 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: ** Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: i also realized that you put A- and T-box in one graph - is this optional or a must? optiona

Re: [Virtuoso-users] CORRECTION 6.1 owl support

2010-02-08 Thread Ted Thibodeau Jr
Kingsley -- This is the snippet that I think needs revision, from the virtuoso-users list -- * On Feb 5, 2010, at 05:59 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: ** Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: i also realized that you put A- and T-box in one graph - is this optional or a must? optional, but my preferred style

Re: [Virtuoso-users] SNORQL SPARQL query BOUND() problem

2010-02-08 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Hello Egon, > SELECT DISTINCT ?property ?hasValue ?isValueOf > WHERE { > { ?property ?hasValue } > UNION > { ?isValueOf ?property } > } > ORDER BY (!BOUND(?hasValue)) ?property ?hasValue ?isValu

[Virtuoso-users] SNORQL SPARQL query BOUND() problem

2010-02-08 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi all, I have installed Virtuoso 6.1 on a machine here in Uppsala [0], and SNORQL from [1]. However, SNORQL defaults to this query for individuals: SELECT DISTINCT ?property ?hasValue ?isValueOf WHERE { { ?property ?hasValue } UNION { ?isVal