Re: [Virtuoso-users] FYI: lod.openlinksw.com/sparql is Offline

2010-01-24 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Stephen Hatton wrote: Hi, I was doing some testing, and I noticed that lod.openlinksw.com/sparql was offline. Is there a way to create some kind of persistently online dataspace that is a virtual replica of the L.O.D.? Thank you, Stephen Hatton It will be

[Virtuoso-users] FYI: lod.openlinksw.com/sparql is Offline

2010-01-24 Thread Stephen Hatton
Hi, I was doing some testing, and I noticed that lod.openlinksw.com/sparql was offline. Is there a way to create some kind of persistently online dataspace that is a virtual replica of the L.O.D.? Thank you, Stephen Hatton

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Feature Request: new SPARQL pragma. define lang "en-US, en, de, fr, none, *"

2010-01-24 Thread Nathan
Aldo Bucchi wrote: > Hi, > > This is a BIG feature request, but it is something that I use daily > via generators and I think we should bring it down into SPARQL itself > as it accounts for a very common usecase. > Of course I could try to write and push this into the next SPARQL > recommendation,

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Feature Request: new SPARQL pragma. define lang "en-US, en, de, fr, none, *"

2010-01-24 Thread Aldo Bucchi
Moreover, "Localization", even more than "inference", belongs to a given user's world view. To the highest layer between the lower end of "the data" and the higher end of "the user". ( data )-( business, rules and other inferences )( geo )( localization )---> ( user ) I don't like ho

[Virtuoso-users] Feature Request: new SPARQL pragma. define lang "en-US, en, de, fr, none, *"

2010-01-24 Thread Aldo Bucchi
Hi, This is a BIG feature request, but it is something that I use daily via generators and I think we should bring it down into SPARQL itself as it accounts for a very common usecase. Of course I could try to write and push this into the next SPARQL recommendation, but then it would eventually cir

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Problem with virtuoso procedure in a sparql query.

2010-01-24 Thread Aldo Bucchi
Hi Ivan, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Ivan Mikhailov wrote: > Hello Aldo, > >> OK, and what about: >> [10]* DefaultGraphClause       ::=  SourceSelector SpongeOptionList? >> [11]* NamedGraphClause         ::=  'NAMED' SourceSelector SpongeOptionList? >> ? > > That costs much more than an ext