Re: [Virtuoso-users] Virtuoso 6 problematic background activity

2009-10-26 Thread James Marsh
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 18:42, Hugh Williams wrote: > Indicating their are 5 deadlocks in the database. Can you try running the > following command form the isql command line too to try and forcibly kill > and release all transactions and locks: > > txn_killall(); > > As detailed at: > > http://do

[Virtuoso-users] Optimizing query (indices?)

2009-10-26 Thread Sebastian TrĂ¼g
Hello list, the following query is rather slow on my Virtuoso 5.0.12 with 603.323 triples: select ?date where { ?r a nfo:FileDataObject . ?r nie:lastModified ?date . } ORDER BY ?date LIMIT 1 How can I optimize such queries? Do I need to define a specific index? Thanks, Sebastian Trueg

Re: [Virtuoso-users] I should warn you that SSD's lifetime under any database application can be smaller than expected

2009-10-26 Thread Ceriel Jacobs
Hi Ivan, On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:19:01 +0700 Ivan Mikhailov wrote: In addition, I should warn you that SSD's lifetime under any database application can be smaller than expected, depending on OS and drivers. That's due to the nature of file I/O in databases. Some smart drivers try to balance num

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Virtuoso 6 problematic background activity

2009-10-26 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi James, Looking at your status output I see: Clients: 143 connects, max 5 concurrent RPC: 2032 calls, -246 pending, 1 max until now, 0 queued, 0 burst reads (0%), 9 second brk=548294656 Checkpoint Remap 278243 pages, 0 mapped back. 2176 s atomic time. DB master 12523008 total 4875616 f

[Virtuoso-users] Virtuoso 6 problematic background activity

2009-10-26 Thread James Marsh
Using virtuoso 6-TP1, several weeks ago, I imported approx 500,000,000 triples from several bio2rdf graphs and built the additional bitmap indices RDF_QUAD_GPOS, RDF_QUAD_OGPS, RDF_QUAD_OPGS, RDF_QUAD_POGS I also created a free text index using: DB.DBA.RDF_OBJ_FT_RULE_ADD(NULL, NULL, 'bio-ft-inde