Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

>> after closing the odbc connection the graph is empty!  any idea what gives? > > Just in case: Perhaps the commands were run in a transaction and you > forgot to do `connection.commit()`? hehe. you're right. my mistake. i needed to call connect.commit() sorry, odbc nb :-)

Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Kurt J wrote: > after closing the odbc connection the graph is empty!  any idea what gives? Just in case: Perhaps the commands were run in a transaction and you forgot to do `connection.commit()`? -- Leo Soto M. http://blog.leosoto.com

[Virtuoso-users] Exception when using concurrent JDBC connections

Hi, Does Virtuoso 6 supports concurrent JDBC connections? When I try to execute simultaneous operations (either from multiples threads or multiple processes) I get the following exception: Caused by: com.hp.hpl.jena.update.UpdateException: Convert results are FAILED.: at virtuoso

Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

Ok. finally using DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML_MT instead of DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML works as expected. not sure i grok the difference between the two. but for me (python 2.5, pyodbc, os x, vos 5.11) only DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML _MT seemed to work properly from the python odbc connection hope this may

Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

> In [61]: connect.execute('''DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML (file_to_string > ('/test-virtuoso/cmn2.rdf'), '', 'http://mygraph.com') ; ''') finally, it seems the problem here is the ';' omitting this it takes the command but there's another problem now: In [4]: connect.execute('''DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML

Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

great thnx Hugh. Still some problems using DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML seems to work fine in ISQL but i get a syntax error in python odbc connection: In [61]: connect.execute('''DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML (file_to_string ('/test-virtuoso/cmn2.rdf'), '', 'http://mygraph.com') ; ''') -

Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

Hi Kurt, I shall have to check with development if the "file://" prefix is supported as I get a similar problem using isql : SQL> sparql load "file://vc-db-1.rdf" into ; *** Error 39000: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]FA005: Can't open file '/usr/local/virtuoso-opens

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Debian packages again

Hi Kjetil, Progress is being made, just slowly. The current binaries are in my Virutoso PPA on Launchpad [1] and refer also to the collab-maint project on Alioth [2] for Debian. The June 25th date I think is the Debian Import Freeze, so if we miss that (which seems likely) then at least w

Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

in case there is another option in my virtuoso.ini file that might be wrong, it is here: http://pastebin.com/m7494e063 cheers, kurt j On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Kurt J wrote: > Hi Hugh, > > thanks but this still does not seem to work.  from the virtuoso.ini file: > > DirsAllowed          

Re: [Virtuoso-users] inserting a local rdf file into the store

Hi Hugh, thanks but this still does not seem to work. from the virtuoso.ini file: DirsAllowed = ., /usr/local/virtuoso-opensource/share/virtuoso/vad, /test-virtuoso i've but the file in '.' and '/test-virtuoso' and '/usr/local/... /vad' to no avail. i get the same error me

Re: [Virtuoso-users] incorrect results from go.bio2rdf.org/sparql

Hello Peter, I see that somebody has made a permanent declaration of namespace prefix "ns:go" for "http://bio2rdf.org/ns/go#";, should be just "go", if any. That can be checked by looking at DB.DBA.SYS_XML_PERSISTENT_NS_DECL (to check whether persistent declaration is recorded), but this seems not

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Debian packages again

On Friday 20 March 2009 15:58:24 Tim Haynes wrote: > You should know that we already have contacts with Debian over this; I'll > chase them up and see what's happening. Any status on this? It is only ten days to go now for it to comfortably go into Ubuntu 9.10, so it is really quite urgent... Ki