Re: [Virtuoso-users] Web SPARQL VS JDBC. Different behavior

2009-04-27 Thread Aldo Bucchi
Hi Hugh, Thanks for your reply. Now that we have some more constants, we can focus on our side of things and stop trying to second guess Virtuoso. We realized that something might be wrong with our data ( see snip below ). Now, how did this happen? I have no idea. But we will soon ;) I have noti

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Debian packages again

2009-04-27 Thread Patrick van Kleef
Hi Kjetil, Just a relevant update on this topic, as Ubuntu Jaunty was released a few days ago, there is a new release schedule for Ubuntu out: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule Note that the DebianImportFreeze is set to 25th of June, so to ensure that Virtuoso is in the next v

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Virtuoso Sesame2 driver exception

2009-04-27 Thread Mirko
Hi Hugh,1) I checked VirtuosoTest.java again. Test 1 passes only if the graph "http://demo.openlinksw.com/demo#this" is already in the DB. I oversaw this in my last run. Is this maybe intended? Test 4 passes in the first run, but fails when re-running the tests (the tupleQuery in test 4 returns 1 r

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Debian packages again

2009-04-27 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
Patrick, Just a relevant update on this topic, as Ubuntu Jaunty was released a few days ago, there is a new release schedule for Ubuntu out: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule Note that the DebianImportFreeze is set to 25th of June, so to ensure that Virtuoso is in the next version o

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Virtuoso Sesame2 driver exception

2009-04-27 Thread Mirko Gontek
Oh sorry, Hugh ... now I messed my build paths completely. With the latest sesame version (2.2.4) all tests pass. Ok. But still, my initial problem remains. I will send you a test program later... Best, Mirko Am 27.04.2009 um 13:55 schrieb Mirko: Hi Hugh, obviously I didn't have the most

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Virtuoso Sesame2 driver exception

2009-04-27 Thread Mirko
Hi Hugh, obviously I didn't have the most recent jdbc-driver and sesame- provider. I just downloaded the recent versions. Now, only tests 1 and 4 fail. Again, when re-running the test (i.e. running the test with an existing context graph in the db) test 1 passes. Driver output is: OpenLink

Re: [Virtuoso-users] N3 import limit?

2009-04-27 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Daniel, It does seem strange that your "sparql load ..." load queries report they have successfully completed when the data has not actually loaded completely. Typically with large datasets of this nature we would expect an error of the form "[Virtuoso Server]SR325: Transaction aborted

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Web SPARQL VS JDBC. Different behavior

2009-04-27 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Aldo, Their are no real differences under the "hood" particularly between iSQL and JDBC with both should be firing exactly the same query against Virtuoso. The only difference I can think of with the SPARQL endpoint is that queries get executed as the special "SPARQL" user. Having said

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Web SPARQL VS JDBC. Different behavior

2009-04-27 Thread Aldo Bucchi
BTW, I am not specifying any default graph when querying via /sparql. On a related note, I assume that there are policy functions at work in some parts of the ODS system ( attached to tables in different modules, below the RDF views ). Is there a way to: * List all these functions? * Override all?