Re: [Virtuoso-users] Surprisingly high number of solutions to long query

2009-02-20 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Friday 20 February 2009 17:55:16 Ivan Mikhailov wrote: > Kjetil, > > LIMIT is for WHERE, if CONSTRUCT may create up to two triples per row > then the resulting graph is no bigger than 2*4 = 8 triples. (I'm writing > "up to two triples per row", not "two triples per row" because in common > case

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Surprisingly high number of solutions to long query

2009-02-20 Thread Ivan Mikhailov
Kjetil, LIMIT is for WHERE, if CONSTRUCT may create up to two triples per row then the resulting graph is no bigger than 2*4 = 8 triples. (I'm writing "up to two triples per row", not "two triples per row" because in common case there may be unbound variables and/or repeating triples). In additio

[Virtuoso-users] Surprisingly high number of solutions to long query

2009-02-20 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
All, I have the following query, which is a rather complex one. The weird thing about it is that I have a LIMIT 4 at the end, but it still gives 6 solutions. I'm a bit uncertain about how LIMIT should work, but to me this looks wrong. prefix dct: prefix rdfs:

Re: [Virtuoso-users] HTTP proxy

2009-02-20 Thread Jem Rayfield
Hi Guys, Any thoughts on this? Cheers Jem -Original Message- From: Patrick van Kleef [mailto:vos.ad...@openlinksw.com] Sent: Tue 17/02/2009 13:35 To: Jem Rayfield Cc: Kingsley Idehen; virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Virtuoso-users] HTTP proxy Hi Jem, > Following on