Hi James,
has anyone succeeded to build the open source version of virtuoso on
os x 10.4 for ppc?
This is one of the platforms where every release of VOS gets tested
before being released.
yes, but with which os version, and which x-code version, and which
ports updates, and ...
I am r
On 2008-12-01, at 22:21 , Patrick van Kleef wrote:
Hi James,
has anyone succeeded to build the open source version of virtuoso on
os x 10.4 for ppc?
This is one of the platforms where every release of VOS gets tested
before being released.
yes, but with which os version, and which x-c
HI Rick,
I did get it to build after much frustration with this
configuration (on a g4 powerbook) . I actually had to manually edit
a couple of the shell scripts that load the vad files because of
some osx wonkiness. Unfortunately this is all on my home computer,
but I'll take a look wh
Hi James,
has anyone succeeded to build the open source version of virtuoso on
os x 10.4 for ppc?
This is one of the platforms where every release of VOS gets tested
before being released.
i checked out the sources and worked through the automake and
configure process, updating several
I did get it to build after much frustration with this configuration (on a g4
powerbook) . I actually had to manually edit a couple of the shell scripts that
load the vad files because of some osx wonkiness. Unfortunately this is all on
my home computer, but I'll take a look when I get home and
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
Quick FYI.
What is Virtuoso+DBpedia AMI for EC2?
An pre-installed and fully tuned edition of Virtuoso that includes a
fully configured DBpedia instance on Amazon's EC2 Cloud platform.
Benefits?
Generally, it provides a no hassles mechanism for instantiating
perso
hello;
has anyone succeeded to build the open source version of virtuoso on
os x 10.4 for ppc?
i checked out the sources and worked through the automake and
configure process, updating several utilities and setting the CFLAGS
as indicated.
i also had to change the flags to build a unive
No Worries! Thanks!
--- On Mon, 12/1/08, Yrjänä Rankka wrote:
> From: Yrjänä Rankka
> I also wanted to publicly apologise Marvin for my rather
> stupid
> sarcastic remark in the first reply, as it goes against the
> philosophy
> and purpose of mailing lists such as these. We're all
> here t
Aldo Bucchi wrote:
Yrjänä,
String literals in predicates is not a very common practicality in
RDF. We only have full-text indexing on object values.
Hmm. Sorry for being sarcastic here. Subject and predicate values cannot
be literals in RDF statements. Just to be clear.
YOU AR
Yrjänä,
>> String literals in predicates is not a very common practicality in
>> RDF. We only have full-text indexing on object values.
> Hmm. Sorry for being sarcastic here. Subject and predicate values cannot
> be literals in RDF statements. Just to be clear.
YOU ARE RIGHT and for all formal pu
Yrjänä Rankka wrote:
Marvin Lugair wrote:
Hi all!
This is more for the virtuoso folks but still cc-ing dbpedia.
Please give us some input if you can answer these questions:
I am trying text search in virtuos from isql against a locally loaded
dbpedia.
*QUESTION ONE*
Why does bif:contains re
Marvin Lugair wrote:
Hi all!
This is more for the virtuoso folks but still cc-ing dbpedia.
Please give us some input if you can answer these questions:
I am trying text search in virtuos from isql against a locally loaded dbpedia.
*QUESTION ONE*
Why does bif:contains return faster than REGEX s
Ivan and Kingsley,
Thanks for your responses!
Things are much clearer now, If I want to search URI's in the property field I
should use regex.
Marv.
--- On Mon, 12/1/08, Ivan Mikhailov wrote:
> From: Ivan Mikhailov
> Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Text Searching in Virtuoso / 2 questi
Hi ,
I tested the sample. That one works, but just because there is a small error at
the end. You're loading model m1 from the database and printing model m.
Changing the code to m1.write(), I'm getting the same error as before.
Till.
>>
Hi Till,
Can you please compile and run the sampl
Hello Marvin,
> Why does bif:contains return faster than REGEX search,
bif:contains return faster because it uses special full-text index to
get IDs of objects that contain words mentioned in the query, it do not
scan the whole table like Regex-based query. The advantage of REGEX is
flexibility:
Marvin Lugair wrote:
Hi all!
This is more for the virtuoso folks but still cc-ing dbpedia.
Please give us some input if you can answer these questions:
I am trying text search in virtuos from isql against a locally loaded dbpedia.
*QUESTION ONE*
Why does bif:contains return faster than REGEX s
Hi all!
This is more for the virtuoso folks but still cc-ing dbpedia.
Please give us some input if you can answer these questions:
I am trying text search in virtuos from isql against a locally loaded dbpedia.
*QUESTION ONE*
Why does bif:contains return faster than REGEX search, and why are they
17 matches
Mail list logo
