Hello Kjetil,
> DESCRIBE ?resource WHERE {
> { ?resource dct:title ?free1 . ?free1 bif:contains "Da*" .
> }
> UNION
> { ?resource dct:subject ?var .
> ?var skos:prefLabel ?free2 .
> ?free2 bif:contains "Da*" .
> }
> }
>
> will work?
Yes, of course, because e
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 19:12:45 Ivan Mikhailov wrote:
> > Ah, yes, it was just an example. In practise, we have some OPTIONALs and
> > a FILTER bound( thing that takes care of all these things.
>
> OK. Just remember that bif:contains will work only with triple in same
> group at same level su
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 08:01:03 you wrote:
> Hi, you're obviously ahead of me in testing the RDF stores out there, so
> would you mind describing why you're looking at virtuoso instead of jena
> now? I gather it's mostly for speed--
Indeed!
> are you seeing good speedups for
> the quer
Drew Perttula wrote:
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
Up to now, we've been running Jena, and the way we have solved this problem is
to concatenate all literals, create a "sub:literals" property, and then
freetext search this property. It works, but queries that returns a few
hundred entries usually
