Emiliano Heyns wrote:
[]
Yes, agreed. That does mean that application builders must take extra care
when including other non-GPL libraries. I've been in discussions where
applications that use JDBC, .Net providers and ODBC fall; the "contact
surface" of the application is not directly with the li
On 3/20/07, Tim Haynes wrote:
After conferring with Kingsley and others, I'd like to set the record
straight on licensing.
First, the GPL says nothing about commercial use or otherwise. It is
Which doesn't mean that OpenLink can't add clauses of its own. It's your
software after all.
per
Emiliano Heyns wrote:
[]
I've been thinking about this, and I am still not certain about how to read
the licensing. If I were to build that CMS, who would get to use it? Only
private persons? Only approved (by whom?) OSS projects? Only OSS Projects
that use the GPL exclusively?
Would a commerci
Thanks for the advice. That will do for now.
-Jukka
On 3/20/07, imikhailov wrote:
Hello Jukka,
I'm sorry for temporary inconvenience. RDF mapping will support more
column
datatypes, the patch is coming soon. In the current version, supported
types
are integer, varchar, date, datetime, timest
