[Virtuoso-users] POP3 server

Where does the POP3 server live? I see some POP related code in pop3_svr.sql, but also bif_pop3.c. What is the relation between these two? Emile

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Installer for Windows version

On 3/15/07, Emiliano Heyns wrote: On 3/15/07, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > > Built using Inno Setup and ISTool. > Simple but does the job. The setup will install Virtuoso, register > virtodbc.dll (am I supposed to do anything with the

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Installer for Windows version

On 3/15/07, Emiliano Heyns wrote: Built using Inno Setup and ISTool. Simple but does the job. The setup will install Virtuoso, register virtodbc.dll (am I supposed to do anything with the other libs in the lib dir?) and optionally

[Virtuoso-users] Installer for Windows version

Built using Inno Setup and ISTool. Simple but does the job. The setup will install Virtuoso, register virtodbc.dll (am I supposed to do anything with the other libs in the lib dir?) and optionally registers and starts the demo server.

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Lots of questions

Emile, > SQL Server has a limitation of 2GB per column, not per row. That means for any given column, the total storage size combined for all rows cannot exceed 2GB. Which is already better than SQL Server 2000, which had 2 2GB limit per table. If Virtouso allows 2GB per row, I don't see any pro

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Lots of questions

On 3/15/07, Hugh Williams wrote: [Hugh] Can you please elaborate more on the need to a limit larger than 2GB as I am sure if we know more about what you are seeking to achieve a means can be devised for doing this all within virtuoso ? From the POV of the media server and the CMS+gallery: $

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Lots of questions

Hi Emile, On 15/3/07 08:39, "Emiliano Heyns" wrote: > On 3/15/07, Hugh Williams wrote: > [Hugh] Virtuoso has the same 2GB limit, although this can be changed it > need be but would break backward compatibility. >>> >>> Ouch, I'm going to hit that limit pretty soon. After the music ser

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Licensing (Was: Virtuoso Open Source Edition and distributed SPARQL queries)

On 3/15/07, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > OK, so ODS is a packaging facility. A platform :-) OK... I think. I'll just go play with it to more get a better feel for it. > I'm still not entirely clear on the non-commercial use clause that I > assume is going to be added to the license for VOS. F

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Licensing (Was: Virtuoso Open Source Edition and distributed SPARQL queries)

Emiliano Heyns wrote: On 3/15/07, *Kingsley Idehen* > wrote: ODS is a Distributed Collaborative Applications (DCA) suite. It provides platforms (app. instances) for: 1. Weblogs 2. Wikis 3. Shared Bookmarks 4. WebDAV based File Server (B

[Virtuoso-users] Licensing (Was: Virtuoso Open Source Edition and distributed SPARQL queries)

On 3/15/07, Kingsley Idehen wrote: ODS is a Distributed Collaborative Applications (DCA) suite. It provides platforms (app. instances) for: 1. Weblogs 2. Wikis 3. Shared Bookmarks 4. WebDAV based File Server (Briefcase) 5. Shared Feeds Subscriptions Live instances exist at: http://myopenlink.