RE: mercurial runtimes vs. ftp

2010-08-12 Fir de Conversatie Steve Hall
From: Tony Mechelynck, Thu, August 12, 2010 5:00 am > On 12/08/10 00:32, Steve Hall wrote: > > As a rule, are the Mercurial runtimes more current than FTP? Or > > are we still in the situation where either patches or FTP files > > could be? (In times past, I found that FTP always superseded > > pat

Re: mercurial runtimes vs. ftp

2010-08-12 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
On 12/08/10 00:32, Steve Hall wrote: As a rule, are the Mercurial runtimes more current than FTP? Or are we still in the situation where either patches or FTP files could be? (In times past, I found that FTP always superseded patches.) -- Steve Hall [ digitect dancingpaper com ] -- You received

mercurial runtimes vs. ftp

2010-08-11 Fir de Conversatie Steve Hall
As a rule, are the Mercurial runtimes more current than FTP? Or are we still in the situation where either patches or FTP files could be? (In times past, I found that FTP always superseded patches.)-- Steve Hall  [ digitect dancingpaper com ] -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" mail