Hi,
2017/8/28 Mon 0:40:12 UTC+9 tux. wrote:
> Ken Takata schrob am Sonntag, 27. August 2017 um 17:19 Zeit:
>
> > When you compile Vim, the first part of the Ruby dll name is decided
> > by the compiler version
>
> Obviously, the decision is not quite correct, because no MinGW is
> involved in my
Ken Takata schrob am Sonntag, 27. August 2017 um 17:19 Zeit:
> When you compile Vim, the first part of the Ruby dll name is decided
> by the compiler version
Obviously, the decision is not quite correct, because no MinGW is
involved in my "stack".
> Didn't you set RUBY_MSVCRT_NAME explicitly?
I
Hi tux,
2017/8/27 Sun 10:59:06 UTC+9 tux. wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is my or Vim's problem, so I won't try to "patch"
> it just yet:
>
> As some of you know, I use to compile my own Vim builds on Visual
> Studio (MSVC from here on). This also means that I have to compile
> Ruby myself, since
I'm not sure if this is my or Vim's problem, so I won't try to "patch"
it just yet:
As some of you know, I use to compile my own Vim builds on Visual
Studio (MSVC from here on). This also means that I have to compile
Ruby myself, since Vim, when compiled with MSVC, does not play well
with the offi
