On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Kazuki Sakamoto
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Bram Moolenaar
> wrote:
> > I generally default to "keep it", so we only remove something if there
> > is nobody who cares about the code. That we didn't have fixes for Win16
> > for five years is a good
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> I generally default to "keep it", so we only remove something if there
> is nobody who cares about the code. That we didn't have fixes for Win16
> for five years is a good indication of that.
How about src/gui_mac.c? It seems for over four
Tux wrote:
> Bram Moolenaar schrob am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016 um 20:55 Zeit:
>
> > Does this even still build?
>
> I could set up a VM to test if this is what its future depends on. Why
> do we have a restriction to "Windows XP onwards" at all?
The reason to remove it is to make it easier t
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 4:55:22 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> There are still a few files for Win 16 GUI:
> src/gui_w16.c
> src/gui_w48.c (16 bit parts)
> src/guiw16rc.h
> src/Make_w16.mak
> src/proto/gui_w16.pro
>
> Vince Negri worked on this, but I haven't heard from him for five y
Hi Bram,
2016/2/18 Thu 4:55:22 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> There are still a few files for Win 16 GUI:
> src/gui_w16.c
> src/gui_w48.c (16 bit parts)
> src/guiw16rc.h
> src/Make_w16.mak
> src/proto/gui_w16.pro
>
> Vince Negri worked on this, but I haven't heard from him for five years.
>
> Doe
Bram Moolenaar schrob am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016 um 20:55 Zeit:
> Does this even still build?
I could set up a VM to test if this is what its future depends on. Why
do we have a restriction to "Windows XP onwards" at all?
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not t
There are still a few files for Win 16 GUI:
src/gui_w16.c
src/gui_w48.c (16 bit parts)
src/guiw16rc.h
src/Make_w16.mak
src/proto/gui_w16.pro
Vince Negri worked on this, but I haven't heard from him for five years.
Does this even still build? I guess we can now remove it, since we only
really su