On 7/8/22 1:47 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
On 7/7/22 2:21 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Other than that, I don't see support of Tree-Sitter, which could be
useful for things like:
- syntax highlighting
- folding
- text objects defined by syntax (to e.g. select or move by
function/class/string/sta
> On 7/7/22 2:21 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Other than that, I don't see support of Tree-Sitter, which could be
> useful for things like:
> - syntax highlighting
> - folding
> - text objects defined by syntax (to e.g. select or move by
> function/class/string/st
On 7/7/22 2:21 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Other than that, I don't see support of Tree-Sitter, which could be
useful for things like:
- syntax highlighting
- folding
- text objects defined by syntax (to e.g. select or move by
function/class/string/statement...)
- and probably other things (e.g
> >> Other than that, I don't see support of Tree-Sitter, which could be
> >> useful for things like:
> >> - syntax highlighting
> >> - folding
> >> - text objects defined by syntax (to e.g. select or move by
> >>function/class/string/statement...)
> >> - and probably other things (e.g. being
On 7/7/22 5:30 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Dominique wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
Other than that, I don't see support of Tree-Sitter, which could be
useful for things like:
- syntax highlighting
- folding
- text objects defined by syntax (to e.g. select or move by
function/class/s
Dominique wrote:
> Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > > when you say built-in LSP support, do you mean written in C, or as a
> > > vim9script plugin?
> >
> > Written in C. There are plugins but I have heard users argue that it
> > would be better if it's built-in. Others say that the plugins are goo
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > when you say built-in LSP support, do you mean written in C, or as a
> > vim9script plugin?
>
> Written in C. There are plugins but I have heard users argue that it
> would be better if it's built-in. Others say that the plugins are good
> enough.
Builtin LSP could als
I wrote:
> It seems currently login to vim.org doesn't work...
That was just me using the wrong password.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
72. Somebody at IRC just mentioned a way to obtain full motion video without
a PC using a wireless protocol called NTSC, you w
> when you say built-in LSP support, do you mean written in C, or as a
> vim9script plugin?
Written in C. There are plugins but I have heard users argue that it
would be better if it's built-in. Others say that the plugins are good
enough.
> And what do you mean with the last item "may hide p
Bram,
when you say built-in LSP support, do you mean written in C, or as a
vim9script plugin?
And what do you mean with the last item "may hide part of the first
line, scroll per screen line"?
It looks like there are quite a few items in the voting list that can
be removed since they have been ad
Bram,
The four you listed are good enough to ponder on. And it might be worth
inducting.
Thanks,
Bhaskar
On Sunday, July 3, 2022 at 10:16:47 PM UTC+5:30 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Now that Vim 9.0 has been released I thought it would be a good moment
> to update the list of features:
> https:/
> Anything else?
What about popup windows improvement -- it would be really nice to have
editable(focused?) popup windows.
It would make all that plugins (fuzzy file finders and the rest) way
better/simpler.
воскресенье, 3 июля 2022 г. в 19:46:47 UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar:
>
> Now that Vim 9.0
Yegappan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 9:46 AM Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > Now that Vim 9.0 has been released I thought it would be a good moment
> > to update the list of features:
> > https://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
> >
> > Although it would be nice to reduce the length of th
Hi Bram,
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 9:46 AM Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Now that Vim 9.0 has been released I thought it would be a good moment
> to update the list of features:
> https://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
>
> Although it would be nice to reduce the length of the list, I find it
> dif
Now that Vim 9.0 has been released I thought it would be a good moment
to update the list of features:
https://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
Although it would be nice to reduce the length of the list, I find it
difficult to decide what items to drop. Perhaps items that won't
happen, such
Now that Vim 7.3 has been released, these features no longer need your
votes, as they have been included:
- "add the conceal patch from Vince Negri"
- "add a strong encryption method"
- "Add the relative numbers patch by Markus Heidelberg"
- "add persistent undo: undo is still possible after exit
16 matches
Mail list logo
