Hi,
2016/7/29 Fri 20:29:33 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > > Sorry, that was confusing. I rearranged the patches:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Lambda with capture-by-value:
> > > >
> > > > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/9a62b8ce9304e1c0f78c70d524c1d8d8a8015cc7/lambda-capture_by_value.p
Hi,
2016/7/29 Fri 4:21:20 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ken Takata wrote:
>
> > 2016/7/28 Thu 7:06:31 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2016/7/28 Thu 0:57:53 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > > Ken Takata wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 2016/7/25 Mon 23:02:25 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > >
Ken Takata wrote:
> 2016/7/28 Thu 7:06:31 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2016/7/28 Thu 0:57:53 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > Ken Takata wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2016/7/25 Mon 23:02:25 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016/7/25 Mon 3:47:51 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrot
Hi,
2016/7/28 Thu 7:06:31 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016/7/28 Thu 0:57:53 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Ken Takata wrote:
> >
> > > 2016/7/25 Mon 23:02:25 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2016/7/25 Mon 3:47:51 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > >
Hi,
2016/7/28 Thu 0:57:53 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ken Takata wrote:
>
> > 2016/7/25 Mon 23:02:25 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2016/7/25 Mon 3:47:51 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2016/7/22 Fri 22:29:33 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > > > Hi ZyX,
> > > >
Ken Takata wrote:
> 2016/7/25 Mon 23:02:25 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2016/7/25 Mon 3:47:51 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2016/7/22 Fri 22:29:33 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > > Hi ZyX,
> > > >
> > > > 2016/7/22 Fri 20:15:33 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
> > > > > >> I was wrong
Hi,
2016/7/25 Mon 23:02:25 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016/7/25 Mon 3:47:51 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2016/7/22 Fri 22:29:33 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > > Hi ZyX,
> > >
> > > 2016/7/22 Fri 20:15:33 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
> > > > >> I was wrong regarding the consequences and why y
Hi,
2016/7/25 Mon 3:47:51 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016/7/22 Fri 22:29:33 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > Hi ZyX,
> >
> > 2016/7/22 Fri 20:15:33 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
> > > >> I was wrong regarding the consequences and why you should alter the
> > > >> GC: it is not memory leak because cycle is
Hi,
2016/7/22 Fri 22:29:33 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi ZyX,
>
> 2016/7/22 Fri 20:15:33 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
> > >> I was wrong regarding the consequences and why you should alter the
> > >> GC: it is not memory leak because cycle is not GC’d. It is *crash*
> > >> because Vim does not know that dicti
Hi ZyX,
2016/7/22 Fri 20:15:33 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
> >> I was wrong regarding the consequences and why you should alter the
> >> GC: it is not memory leak because cycle is not GC’d. It is *crash*
> >> because Vim does not know that dictionary is referenced:
> >>
> >> ```VimL
> >> function F()
> >>
2016-07-22 14:12 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov :
> 2016-07-22 14:09 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov :
>> 2016-07-20 21:23 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2016/7/19 Tue 23:18:30 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
2016-07-19 17:15 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov
:
> 201
2016-07-22 14:09 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov :
> 2016-07-20 21:23 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016/7/19 Tue 23:18:30 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
>>> 2016-07-19 17:15 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov
>>> :
>>> > 2016-07-19 16:46 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> 2016/7
2016-07-20 21:23 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
> Hi,
>
> 2016/7/19 Tue 23:18:30 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
>> 2016-07-19 17:15 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov :
>> > 2016-07-19 16:46 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> 2016/7/18 Mon 11:26:23 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> 2016/7/1
Hi,
2016/7/19 Tue 23:18:30 UTC+9 ZyX wrote:
> 2016-07-19 17:15 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov :
> > 2016-07-19 16:46 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2016/7/18 Mon 11:26:23 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> 2016/7/17 Sun 21:26:29 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
> >>> > I additio
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
[...]
> >> The difference is a space between a lambda expression and its arguments.
> >> A similar example is here:
> >>
> >>let x = function('sin') (1) " E15
> >>let x = function('sin')(1) " OK
> >>
> >> I'm not sure this is intended.
> >
> > Yes, there should not
2016-07-19 17:56 GMT+03:00 Bram Moolenaar :
>
> Ken Takata wrote:
>
>> 2016/7/18 Mon 11:26:23 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > 2016/7/17 Sun 21:26:29 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
>> > > I additionally submit another test case.
>> > >
>> > > let Y = {f -> (({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}) ({x -> f ({y
Ken Takata wrote:
> 2016/7/18 Mon 11:26:23 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2016/7/17 Sun 21:26:29 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
> > > I additionally submit another test case.
> > >
> > > let Y = {f -> (({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}) ({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}))}
> > > let Fact = {f -> {x -> (x == 0
2016-07-19 17:15 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov :
> 2016-07-19 16:46 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016/7/18 Mon 11:26:23 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2016/7/17 Sun 21:26:29 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
>>> > I additionally submit another test case.
>>> >
>>> > let Y = {f -> (({x
2016-07-19 16:46 GMT+03:00 Ken Takata :
> Hi,
>
> 2016/7/18 Mon 11:26:23 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016/7/17 Sun 21:26:29 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
>> > I additionally submit another test case.
>> >
>> > let Y = {f -> (({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}) ({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}))}
>> > let Fact =
Hi,
2016/7/18 Mon 11:26:23 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016/7/17 Sun 21:26:29 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
> > I additionally submit another test case.
> >
> > let Y = {f -> (({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}) ({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}))}
> > let Fact = {f -> {x -> (x == 0 ? 1 : x * f(x - 1))}}
> > echo
Hi,
2016/7/17 Sun 21:26:29 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
> I additionally submit another test case.
>
> let Y = {f -> (({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}) ({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}))}
> let Fact = {f -> {x -> (x == 0 ? 1 : x * f(x - 1))}}
> echo Y(Fact)(5)
>
> I expect this script prints 120 but I got E110: Mis
I additionally submit another test case.
let Y = {f -> (({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}) ({x -> f ({y -> x(x)(y)})}))}
let Fact = {f -> {x -> (x == 0 ? 1 : x * f(x - 1))}}
echo Y(Fact)(5)
I expect this script prints 120 but I got E110: Missing ')' in 7.4.2049 (and
also with the experimental patch).
I
Hi,
2016/7/17 Sun 19:37:09 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi itchyny,
>
> 2016/7/17 Sun 10:08:02 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 2:56:44 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > Ken Hamada wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Bram and Ken Takata.
> > > >
> > > > I think there is some problem in
Hi itchyny,
2016/7/17 Sun 10:08:02 UTC+9 itchyny wrote:
> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 2:56:44 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Ken Hamada wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Bram and Ken Takata.
> > >
> > > I think there is some problem in variable substitution of lambda function.
> > >
> > > echo ({y -> ({
On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 2:56:44 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ken Hamada wrote:
>
> > Hi Bram and Ken Takata.
> >
> > I think there is some problem in variable substitution of lambda function.
> >
> > echo ({y -> ({x -> x(y)(10)})({y -> y})})({z -> z})
> >
> > yields an error `E121: Und
Ken Hamada wrote:
> Hi Bram and Ken Takata.
>
> I think there is some problem in variable substitution of lambda function.
>
> echo ({y -> ({x -> x(y)(10)})({y -> y})})({z -> z})
>
> yields an error `E121: Undefined variable: y`. I expect this expression
> yields 10. I tested on Vim 7.4.2048.
Sorry, I got E117, not E121.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
Hi Bram and Ken Takata.
I think there is some problem in variable substitution of lambda function.
echo ({y -> ({x -> x(y)(10)})({y -> y})})({z -> z})
yields an error `E121: Undefined variable: y`. I expect this expression yields
10. I tested on Vim 7.4.2048.
JavaScript:
(function(y){ return (
28 matches
Mail list logo
