Re: 7.3.001 missing 7.3.002 duplicated

2010-08-17 Fir de Conversatie Xavier de Gaye
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Xavier de Gaye wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, björn wrote: > > The changes are different: > > vim-hg-working$ hg extdiff -c fde086181841 -p diff -o -qr > Files vim-hg-working.f0915ae869cf/src/ex_docmd.c and > vim-hg-working.fde086181841/src/ex_docmd.c d

Re: 7.3.001 missing 7.3.002 duplicated

2010-08-17 Fir de Conversatie björn
On 17 August 2010 12:27, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Björn Winckler wrote: > >> Looking at the Mercurial repo I see 7.3.002 applied twice, but I can't >> see 7.3.001 anywhere.  At first I suspected only the commit messages >> were wrong but it looks like 7.3.002 really has been applied twice. > > Whe

Re: 7.3.001 missing 7.3.002 duplicated

2010-08-17 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Björn Winckler wrote: > Looking at the Mercurial repo I see 7.3.002 applied twice, but I can't > see 7.3.001 anywhere. At first I suspected only the commit messages > were wrong but it looks like 7.3.002 really has been applied twice. Where do you see this? When I look online, the version.c cl

Re: 7.3.001 missing 7.3.002 duplicated

2010-08-17 Fir de Conversatie Xavier de Gaye
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, björn wrote: > > Looking at the Mercurial repo I see 7.3.002 applied twice, but I can't > see 7.3.001 anywhere.  At first I suspected only the commit messages > were wrong but it looks like 7.3.002 really has been applied twice. > The changes are different: vim-

7.3.001 missing 7.3.002 duplicated

2010-08-17 Fir de Conversatie björn
Hi, Looking at the Mercurial repo I see 7.3.002 applied twice, but I can't see 7.3.001 anywhere. At first I suspected only the commit messages were wrong but it looks like 7.3.002 really has been applied twice. Björn -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Ty