On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 10:22:37AM -0800, ZyX wrote:
> > forgive my banality, but by any chance is there an extra 's' in the
> > subject of this email?
>
> Function was named in such a way because vim.foo objects are normally defined
> with Foo* functions and vim.options is named vim.options and
> forgive my banality, but by any chance is there an extra 's' in the
> subject of this email?
Function was named in such a way because vim.foo objects are normally defined
with Foo* functions and vim.options is named vim.options and not vim.option
because it grants access to the number of optio
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:29:00PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> ZyX wrote:
forgive my banality, but by any chance is there an extra 's' in the
subject of this email?
--
_|_ _ __|_|_ ._ o|
|_(_)(_)|_| ||_)||<
|
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" mail
ZyX wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User ZyX
> # Date 1386410239 -14400
> # Sat Dec 07 13:57:19 2013 +0400
> # Branch fix-sa-warning-1
> # Node ID c87415f3c0adc44106d6c2944c53f721c94cc6f5
> # Parent 486655e0c5a21469364d3cf895535137f09b3724
> Fix error found by @Ken Takata
Thanks, I'll i
# HG changeset patch
# User ZyX
# Date 1386410239 -14400
# Sat Dec 07 13:57:19 2013 +0400
# Branch fix-sa-warning-1
# Node ID c87415f3c0adc44106d6c2944c53f721c94cc6f5
# Parent 486655e0c5a21469364d3cf895535137f09b3724
Fix error found by @Ken Takata
diff -r 486655e0c5a2 -r c87415f3c0ad src/if