Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Andrei Olsen
> > 2. 64-bit WinPE does not have a WOW64 subsystem, hence you cannot run > > a 32-bit executable. > > What is WinPE? Windows Preinstallation Environment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Preinstallation_Environment http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825110.aspx Basically, a live

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Fritz wrote: > On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:01:05 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Skeept wrote: > > > Also for the next release, if possible would it be possible to > > > distribute a 64 bit for windows as well a 32 bit? > > > > It's not all that useful. It uses more memory, is probably

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Andrei Olsen
> For me compiling ruby with visual studio was the way to go since I have tried > to build with mingw and python and for some reason it did not link correctly > (the 32 bit version works fine). Oh, I forgot that I had a slightly modified make file. It will work if you add -DMS_WIN64 to DEFINES

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie xxx
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:05:23 AM UTC-5, Andrei Olsen wrote: > kl. 23:40:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 21. mai 2013 skrev skeept følgende: > > > Well, I have downloaded the 64 bit 2.0-p195 rubyinstaller from > > http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/ > > > and configured ruby with > > > RUBY="C:\htemp\Rub

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Andrei Olsen
kl. 23:40:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 21. mai 2013 skrev skeept følgende: > Well, I have downloaded the 64 bit 2.0-p195 rubyinstaller from > http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/ > and configured ruby with > RUBY="C:\htemp\Ruby200-x64" DYNAMIC_RUBY=yes RUBY_VER=20 RUBY_VER_LONG=2.0.0 ^ > > when compiling I g

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-21 Fir de Conversatie skeept
> > > Was this patch applied already? > > > > > > I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some > > > include file could not be found. > > > > > > If possible could this patch be included for the next release? > > > > AFAIK this was included in patch 7.3.889. >

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-21 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:01:05 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Skeept wrote: > > > > > > Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out. > > > > > > Was this patch applied already? > > > > > > I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some > > > include file coul

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-21 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Skeept wrote: > > Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out. > > Was this patch applied already? > > I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some > include file could not be found. > > If possible could this patch be included for the next release? AFAIK this was i

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-05-21 Fir de Conversatie skeept
> > > > Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out. > > Was this patch applied already? I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some include file could not be found. If possible could this patch be included for the next release? A small example on how to use rub

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-03-27 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Kohei Suzuki wrote: > On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:30:48 PM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > eagletmt wrote: > > > > > > > > > I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic > > > > > on 64bit platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0. I attached a patch > > > > > to fix

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-03-27 Fir de Conversatie Kohei Suzuki
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:30:48 PM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > eagletmt wrote: > > > > > I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic > > > on 64bit platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0. I attached a patch > > > to fix it. Please check it. > > > > Thanks.

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-03-26 Fir de Conversatie Ken Takata
Hi Bram and eagletmt, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > eagletmt wrote: > > > I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic > > on 64bit platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0. I attached a patch > > to fix it. Please check it. > > Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out. I c

Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-03-26 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
eagletmt wrote: > I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic > on 64bit platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0. I attached a patch > to fix it. Please check it. Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out. Please give us your name. I do not include code from anonymo

[PATCH] Fix compilation failure with Ruby 2.0.0

2013-03-26 Fir de Conversatie eagletmt
Hi list, I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic on 64bit platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0. I attached a patch to fix it. Please check it. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are re