Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2016-02-22 Fir de Conversatie Justin M. Keyes
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 8:38:42 PM UTC-4, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2013-04-24, Sung Pae wrote: > > > So I retract my last response: a global-local formatprg is clearly > > useful for both prose and code, and comes at the cost of a small > > non-breaking change. > > > > Tony Mechelynck's c

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2013-04-25 Fir de Conversatie Gary Johnson
On 2013-04-24, Sung Pae wrote: > So I retract my last response: a global-local formatprg is clearly > useful for both prose and code, and comes at the cost of a small > non-breaking change. > > Tony Mechelynck's criticism is that it is superfluous. I disagreeāļ™, but > you will have to convince him

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2013-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Sung Pae
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:52:26PM -0700, Chiel92 wrote: > On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:36:21 AM UTC+1, Sung Pae wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:45:45AM -0800, Chiel92 wrote: > > > > > Is there any progression on this subject? I'm currently writing a > > > code format plugin, which heavil

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2013-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Chiel92
On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:36:21 AM UTC+1, Sung Pae wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:45:45AM -0800, Chiel92 wrote: > > > > > Is there any progression on this subject? I'm currently writing a code > > > format plugin, which heavily relies on this issue. > > > > While I hesitate to campa

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2013-01-24 Fir de Conversatie Sung Pae
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:45:45AM -0800, Chiel92 wrote: > Is there any progression on this subject? I'm currently writing a code > format plugin, which heavily relies on this issue. While I hesitate to campaign against my own patch, I think a _code_ formatting plugin should either use 'formatexp

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2013-01-24 Fir de Conversatie Chiel92
On Sunday, August 14, 2011 5:38:58 AM UTC+2, Sung Pae wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > > > ### REGARDING THE DRAWBACKS OF formatexpr ### > > On 13 Aug 2011, at 3:06 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > > > Even with a global 'formatprg', you can use buffer-local 'formatexpr' > > (which overrides it

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2011-08-13 Fir de Conversatie Sung Pae
Thank you for your reply. ### REGARDING THE DRAWBACKS OF formatexpr ### On 13 Aug 2011, at 3:06 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > Even with a global 'formatprg', you can use buffer-local 'formatexpr' > (which overrides it). 'formatexpr' can do whatever it wants with, for > instance, values of Vim op

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2011-08-13 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
On 11/08/11 18:42, Sung Pae wrote: Hello, I was wondering if there was any feedback on the patch supplied regarding `formatprg`: http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/browse_thread/thread/7052b5523b2dc809 Is there something I could do to improve the patch, or are there implications to this ch

Re: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2011-08-11 Fir de Conversatie Sung Pae
Hello, I was wondering if there was any feedback on the patch supplied regarding `formatprg`: http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/browse_thread/thread/7052b5523b2dc809 Is there something I could do to improve the patch, or are there implications to this change that I have not considered? Che

[PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option.

2011-08-07 Fir de Conversatie Sung Pae
/ffca45a9c8dd4da1 -- >From 3a37fa9fbe743d75b4bf7b76635ebd26e1cd0210 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: guns Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 04:49:45 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Convert formatprg to a global-local option. Since the purpose of the formatprg option is to allow external programs to reflow non-sou