Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Bram! On Mo, 23 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Thanks. However, it seems the test doesn't check if ";" does not move > the cursor, only that it moves the cursor. I would expect the test to > use ";;;" in the second line. Or "tt;". > Your second message doesn't appear to change this. Oh

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: > On So, 22 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > > > On So, 22 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > > > It's true that using ";" after a "t" command is currently close to > > > > useless. Changing this would be backwards inc

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi On Mo, 23 Mai 2011, Christian Brabandt wrote: [patch] Upps, it was missing, that in nocompatible mode, vim's behaviour shouldn't be changed. Attached is an updated patch. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are repl

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-23 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Bram! On So, 22 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > On So, 22 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > It's true that using ";" after a "t" command is currently close to > > > useless. Changing this would be backwards incompatible, but I doubt > > > anyone

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: > On So, 22 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > It's true that using ";" after a "t" command is currently close to > > useless. Changing this would be backwards incompatible, but I doubt > > anyone would notice. I hardly use ";" anyway. Would there be any > > plugi

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Bram! On So, 22 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > It's true that using ";" after a "t" command is currently close to > useless. Changing this would be backwards incompatible, but I doubt > anyone would notice. I hardly use ";" anyway. Would there be any > plugin that breaks? I can't think

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Fr, 20 Mai 2011, Ben Bergman wrote: > > > Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-31-generic #61-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 8 18:24:35 UTC > > 2011 i686 GNU/Linux > > VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr 16 2010 12:40:58) > > > > I am trying to use the ; command to repeat a search

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-21 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Ben! On Fr, 20 Mai 2011, Ben Bergman wrote: > Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-31-generic #61-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 8 18:24:35 UTC > 2011 i686 GNU/Linux > VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr 16 2010 12:40:58) > > I am trying to use the ; command to repeat a search done with t but > since the curs

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-20 Fir de Conversatie James Vega
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:56:50PM -0500, Ben Bergman wrote: > Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-31-generic #61-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 8 18:24:35 UTC > 2011 i686 GNU/Linux > VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr 16 2010 12:40:58) > > I am trying to use the ; command to repeat a search done with t but > si

Re: ; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-20 Fir de Conversatie Ingo Karkat
On 20-May-2011 22:56, Ben Bergman wrote: > I am trying to use the ; command to repeat a search done with t but > since the cursor is already in front of a value that matches the > criteria, it does not repeat the search. The same thing happens when I > use , as the cursor goes to the right of the m

; and , functionality with t command

2011-05-20 Fir de Conversatie Ben Bergman
Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-31-generic #61-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 8 18:24:35 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr 16 2010 12:40:58) I am trying to use the ; command to repeat a search done with t but since the cursor is already in front of a value that matches the criteria,