Re: Vim syntax file should not require interpreter support to highlight :{interp}<

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Charles Campbell wrote: > James McCoy wrote: > >> >> >> On Aug 21, 2013 1:42 PM, "Charles Campbell" > > wrote: >> > >> > LCD 47 wrote: >> >> >> >> ..snip.. >> >> >> >> +1 for this. People routinely edit files that only make

Re: [fix] xsl.vim stylesheet lacks exclude-result-prefixes

Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Peter Prohaska wrote: > >> the transform element already contains the missing >> exclude-result-prefixes attribute. Since stylesheet and transform are >> synonymous, we can reuse the existing entry. Proposed micro fix: >> >> &

Re: Vim syntax file should not require interpreter support to highlight :{interp}<

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Ingo Karkat wrote: [...] > I came to the same conclusion: While it is noble that the Vim syntax > plugin notifies the user that the used script interpreter is not > available in the current editor, having huge blocks of red error > highlighting is certainly overdoi

Re: using DirectX/DirectWrite for rendering text.

Pasting text produces inconstisten screen state. Looks like a mixture of monospaced and proportional font. Resetting rop to empty fixes the problem--and reintroduces the missing char glyphs. Attached is screenshot with the lines showing 1) state right after paste (cursor was aligned above the 2nd-

Re: using DirectX/DirectWrite for rendering text.

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Ken Takata wrote: > Using DirectWrite seems to fix the following issue from the todo.txt: > >> 8 Win32: Multi-byte characters are not displayed, even though the same font >> in Notepad can display them. (Srinath Avadhanula) Try with the >> UTF-8-demo.txt

[fix] xsl.vim stylesheet lacks exclude-result-prefixes

Hi, the transform element already contains the missing exclude-result-prefixes attribute. Since stylesheet and transform are synonymous, we can reuse the existing entry. Proposed micro fix: "" Assuming pwd is vim (hg) source :e runtime/autoload/xml/xsl.vim :/transform/y :/stylesheet'/:put "0 :s/t

Re: Moving cursor to start of current word

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 21:14, Tony Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about eb then? (forward to end of word, then back to begin of > word). Hm, this works when in the space between words, but not when on > the last letter of a word. OK: heb (left one, right to end of word, left > to be

Right-align vs right-justify documentation?

Hi, the docs tell me that... :help right-justify """There is no command in Vim to right justify text. [...]""" :help :right """Right-align lines in [...]""" Doesn't that mean, that at least 'gq' followd by ':right' would "right- justify" whatever text object? Not sure if i'm missing some subtle