Re: Issue 255 in vim: Avoid interpreting kepress '`' + 'i" as 'ì' instead of '`i' and going to the respective mark on the English International Keyboard on Windows

2014-09-22 Fir de Conversatie Juan Campa
Here's a build with the patch: http://tuxproject.de/projects/vim/ On Monday, September 8, 2014 8:02:10 AM UTC-4, v...@googlecode.com wrote: > Status: New > > Owner: > > Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium > > > > New issue 255 by christia...@gmail.com: Avoid interpreting kepress '`' >

Re: Issue 255 in vim: Avoid interpreting kepress '`' + 'i" as 'ì' instead of '`i' and going to the respective mark on the English International Keyboard on Windows

2014-09-22 Fir de Conversatie Juan Campa
On Monday, September 8, 2014 8:02:10 AM UTC-4, v...@googlecode.com wrote: > Status: New > > Owner: > > Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium > > > > New issue 255 by christia...@gmail.com: Avoid interpreting kepress '`' > > + 'i" as 'ì' instead of '`i' and going to the respective mark on

Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept: thread-safe message queue

2014-02-19 Fir de Conversatie Juan Campa
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:11:52 PM UTC-5, ZyX wrote: > Not when it gets the chance. Check out the following: make server run `while > 1 | sleep 1 | endwhile` and send that expression (I tested it on > `input("abc")`). You will see that despite something being run received > expression w

Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept: thread-safe message queue

2014-02-19 Fir de Conversatie Juan Campa
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:44:24 AM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote: > I thought the idea of this patch, was to allow background threads to send Vim > a message, that says "when you get a chance, run function X". Then, at some > later point in time, when Vim is not busy, it will run function X *IN T