Re: [vim/vim] Add 'stickybuf' support (PR #13903)

still work just the same as it has, I could be wrong. On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 8:43 PM Tom M <7to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 8:31 PM Colin Kennedy wrote: > >> Does :cc still honor the switchbuf=vsplit setting after this change? >> >> It’s n

Re: [vim/vim] Add 'stickybuf' support (PR #13903)

Does :cc still honor the switchbuf=vsplit setting after this change? It’s nested in the PR replies currently but I think I asked whether we need this now in this PR and the consensus was to handle it as a horizontal split. If people want customizations, that can come in another revision. It

Re: How should I handle 'stickybuf' fallback behavior?

2:12:51 PM UTC-8 Christian Brabandt wrote: > > On So, 21 Jan 2024, Colin Kennedy wrote: > > > Hello again, > > > > Some good news and bad news. > > > > Good news - I have a branch working and it even passing GitHub’s CI, > which is comforting! > > Bad n

Re: How should I handle 'stickybuf' fallback behavior?

o either. Thanks, Colin ​ On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 11:29:33 AM UTC-8 Christian Brabandt wrote: > > On Di, 16 Jan 2024, Colin Kennedy wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > I had to take a break from this for a while but I'm back at it. Since > > then,

Re: How should I handle 'stickybuf' fallback behavior?

7; windows”. Currently there’s no :windo! so it seemed like a good reason to add [!] to :windo. If you could weigh in on what the expected behavior should be, that’d be really helpful. Thank you! Colin ​ On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 6:01:37 PM UTC-8 Colin Kennedy wrote: > Hi Christ

Re: How should I handle 'stickybuf' fallback behavior?

g `'stickybuf'` windows". Currently there's no `:windo!` so it seemed like a good reason to add `[!]` to `:windo`. If you could weigh in on what the expected behavior should be, that'd be really helpful. Thank you! Colin On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 6:01:37 PM U

Re: How should I handle 'stickybuf' fallback behavior?

[!] is not present, the command fails.”. Since :windo has no !, I was wondering if 'stickybuf' would be a good opportunity to give :windo parity with the other :foodo[!] commands. Thanks, Colin ​ On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 10:47:46 PM UTC Christian Brabandt wrote: > > On Mi, 27

Re: How should I handle 'stickybuf' fallback behavior?

Hi Shane, I replied to you over at #6445 . As for the two tickets linked, #8122 is very different in terms of the issue described and a proposed solution. It's hard to compare them. A preview window is able to help

How should I handle 'stickybuf' fallback behavior?

Hi everyone, I hope this is the right place to ask a question to Vim maintainers. My question is about this post: https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/6445 The summary of the post above is “I would like a ‘local to window’ option that pins a buffer to that window”. It’s a great idea however implemen