Re: Patch 7.4.858

2015-09-09 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
Confirmed, the docs are there now. Thanks! On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 8:27:28 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > Really happy to see those new commands being added! After updating Vim > > I tried :h :cdo, but no help was found. I che

Re: Patch 7.4.858

2015-09-08 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
Really happy to see those new commands being added! After updating Vim I tried :h :cdo, but no help was found. I checked my repository and indeed, the added documentation is nowhere to be found. As you can see in the commit on GitHub [1] there are no changes to runtime/doc/quickfix.txt. Looks li

Re: Issue 212 in vim: feedkeys(".", "n") inside a macro inserts @. register instead of repeating last operation

2015-01-16 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
I just ran into the same problem ended up here. I would appreciate if this could get fixed. I'm using version 7.4.567 on Mac OS. Thanks! On Monday, September 15, 2014 at 6:21:23 AM UTC+2, v...@googlecode.com wrote: > Comment #1 on issue 212 by jke...@connectwise.com: feedkeys(".", "n") > insid

Re: allow to vimgrep current buffer

2014-11-04 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
Similarly, I feel like ":`<,`>" would be consistent with with how "'" is linewise and "`" is character wise (single quote vs backtick). On Monday, November 3, 2014 9:25:21 PM UTC+1, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > On Mi, 29 Okt 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > It co

Re: [PATCH] Make i( and i[ text objects behave like i{

2014-06-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Friday, June 13, 2014 4:39:37 PM UTC+2, Tom McDonald wrote: > Here's a recording of a demonstration of the current behaviour: > > https://asciinema.org/a/10129 I agree that this change is useful and more consistent. @Tom: In the meantime you could try targets.vim [1] which supports that beha

Re: Highlighting artefacts / glitches prompted by low updatetime

2014-06-12 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Thursday, June 12, 2014 12:54:14 PM UTC+2, bo...@airbladesoftware.com wrote: > Hello! > > I have a plugin which updates signs when a CursorHold auto-command fires > (among other auto-commands). When `updatetime` is set to a low value, say > anything under 100, and highlighting is in effect,

Re: Patch 7.4.310

2014-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 4:47:35 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > I wrote: > > > > > Patch 7.4.310 > > > Problem:getpos()/setpos() don't include curswant. > > > Solution: Add a fifth number when getting/setting the cursor. > > > Files: src/eval.c, src/testdir/test_eval.in,

Re: Patch to utilize undefined text-objects

2014-03-28 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Friday, March 28, 2014 2:50:39 AM UTC+1, Daniel "paradigm" Thau wrote: > On Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:05:08 PM UTC-4, Ben Fritz wrote: > > On Friday, January 31, 2014 1:54:30 PM UTC-6, Daniel "paradigm" Thau wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:07:19 PM UTC-5, Daniel "paradigm" Thau >

Re: Issue 202 in vim: Dot operator doesn't work with user-defined insert functions

2014-03-13 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Saturday, March 8, 2014 12:37:38 AM UTC+1, v...@googlecode.com wrote: > Comment #7 on issue 202 by howej...@gmail.com: Dot operator doesn't work > > with user-defined insert functions > > http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=202 > > > > No problem! Thank you for your input. > >

Re: [patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2014-02-15 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Saturday, February 15, 2014 5:25:10 PM UTC+1, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > On Saturday, July 6, 2013 1:35:26 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to test

Re: [patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2014-02-15 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Saturday, July 6, 2013 1:35:26 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > In order to test the changes I made, I started out with a patch that > > > helped me to find and verify 'statusline' options that show the nine >

Re: Operator-pending mappings don't remember last count when being repeated

2014-01-29 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 9:27:32 PM UTC+1, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Mi, 29 Jan 2014, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 3:51:25 PM UTC+1, glts wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Christian Wellenb

Re: Operator-pending mappings don't remember last count when being repeated

2014-01-29 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 3:51:25 PM UTC+1, glts wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Christian Wellenbrock > > wrote: > > > Here is a small example to illustrate the issue: > > > > > > echo 123456789 | vim - +":omap a0 :execute 'n

Operator-pending mappings don't remember last count when being repeated

2014-01-29 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
Here is a small example to illustrate the issue: echo 123456789 | vim - +":omap a0 :execute 'norm 0v'.v:count1.'lh'" This invocation puts the string "123456789" into a new buffer and creates an operator-pending mapping `a0` that selects the first characters of the current line for the pending

Re: Strange behaviour for visual mode

2014-01-23 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:57:04 PM UTC+1, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Thu, January 23, 2014 15:48, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 7:49:33 AM UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote: > > >> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:10:32 AM UTC

Re: Strange behaviour for visual mode

2014-01-23 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 7:49:33 AM UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote: > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:10:32 AM UTC-6, Anton Shemerey wrote: > > Recently i made a mistake, and wrote following command, for selected text, > > and editor just disappear > > > > i've tried it for bought vim, and macvim w

Re: [PATCH] Non-blocking job control for vimscript

2014-01-22 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:24:27 PM UTC+1, Thiago Arruda wrote: > This patch implements a simple but efficient form of job-control for > vimscript, > > enabling vim to cooperate with long-running processes without blocking the UI. > > > > It is my second attempt to bring multitasking to vi

Re: 100% CPU usage, while vim tries to highlight syntax in a specific file

2014-01-20 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Monday, January 20, 2014 1:08:07 PM UTC+1, Lech Lorens wrote: > On 20-Jan-2014 Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Anhad Jai Singh > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > When I do 'o' (plain old 'o', no fancy mappings nothing, the deafult > > > > open-INSERT-mode

Re: Proposed improvement to the quickfix window statusline

2014-01-20 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Monday, January 20, 2014 1:37:10 AM UTC+1, Gary Johnson wrote: > One problem I've found with using the quickfix window is that when > > it is open, the quickfix list traversal commands :cn, :cp, etc., no > > longer display "(n of m)" in the command line. > > > > To work around that problem,

Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept: thread-safe message queue

2014-01-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:53:07 AM UTC+1, Thiago Arruda wrote: > Today I got some free time and decided to give this patch another try. > > > > I have made a few modifications to the original: > > > > - Rebased against the current master > > - Removed the 'defer' function, and added an

Re: gUgn not repeated with .

2013-11-13 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:23:03 AM UTC+1, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > On Monday, August 12, 2013 9:22:21 PM UTC+2, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > On Do, 08 Aug 2013, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote: > > > > > > > > > As per the subject :) > > > &g

Re: gUgn not repeated with .

2013-11-13 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Monday, August 12, 2013 9:22:21 PM UTC+2, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Do, 08 Aug 2013, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote: > > > > > As per the subject :) > > > > Can you check, whether the attached patch fixes it for you? > > > > regards, > > Christian > > -- > > Was die Welt in diesem Auge

Re: Patch to add the :cdo and :ldo commands

2013-10-11 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Monday, September 30, 2013 6:01:58 PM UTC+2, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Mon, September 30, 2013 17:53, eckes wrote: > > > +1 have this demand too:http://stackoverflow.com/q/19097216/520162 > > > > While I like the idea of having a :cdo and :ldo command, for the time > > being, you can s

Re: [patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2013-07-05 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 4:06:32 PM UTC+2, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > 2013/7/3 Bram Moolenaar > > > > > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > I added the MB_CHAR2LEN macro and used that instead of mb_char2len. > > > > > > Does th

Re: [patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2013-07-03 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
2013/7/3 Bram Moolenaar > > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > I added the MB_CHAR2LEN macro and used that instead of mb_char2len. > > > > Does the mb_char2bytes call need a has_mbyte check as well? > > > > Are there any other issues that need to resolved

Re: Can't build v7-3-1189

2013-06-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
; > > -Manny > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Christian Wellenbrock > wrote: > > > > > On Friday, June 14, 2013 9:15:48 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > > I just cloned a

Re: Can't build v7-3-1189

2013-06-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Friday, June 14, 2013 9:15:48 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > > > I just cloned a completely new copy of the hg vim sources and called > > > > > make from the src folder. I get the following errors: > > &

Re: Can't build v7-3-1189

2013-06-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Friday, June 14, 2013 7:16:16 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > I just cloned a completely new copy of the hg vim sources and called > > > make from the src folder. I get the following errors: > > > https:

Can't build v7-3-1189

2013-06-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
I just cloned a completely new copy of the hg vim sources and called make from the src folder. I get the following errors: https://gist.github.com/wellle/5783452/raw/b7b02012331575f646b5bb09246329947ae7eb44/gistfile1.txt -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-p

Very slow yaml syntax highlighting (7.3.1106)

2013-06-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
I attached a yaml file as example. Please open it with vim to test the highlighting speed. Scolling and searching is very slow. Tested on vim 7.3.1106 -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more infor

Re: [RFC] Revision of Objective-C Syntax

2013-06-04 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
2013/6/4 Kazunobu Kuriyama > On Jun 5, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Christian Wellenbrock < > christian.wellenbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes the update fixed the problems. You saved it with Windows line > endings again though. > > I apologize to you for getting

Re: [RFC] Revision of Objective-C Syntax

2013-06-04 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
s you pointed out, at least for the given part > of the code. > > > > KK > > > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > > > > I quickly scrolled over some AFNetworking sources [1]. I like the > > highlighting of

Re: [RFC] Revision of Objective-C Syntax

2013-06-04 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 4:33:11 PM UTC+2, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 4:27:49 PM UTC+2, David Fishburn wrote: > > > ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "

Re: [RFC] Revision of Objective-C Syntax

2013-06-04 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 4:27:49 PM UTC+2, David Fishburn wrote: > ...> > > > > > > > > "AdjustIo.h" 81L, 2743C > > > Error detected while processing /usr/share/vim/vim73/syntax/objc.vim: > > > line    6: > > > E492: Not an editor command: ^M > > > line    8: > > > E15: Invalid expressio

Re: [RFC] Revision of Objective-C Syntax

2013-06-04 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 3:12:20 PM UTC+2, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > Hi, > > > > I'm the maintainer of the Objective-C syntax file, syntax/objc.vim. As the > new features that have been added to the language for years appear to become > stable and have passed the point of no return (really?)

Re: [patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
enaar > > Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > Hi vim_dev, > > > > I recently noticed the following inconsistency regarding the 'fillchars' > and 'statusline options: > > > > - multi-byte 'fillchars' work with default &#

Re: [patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Monday, June 3, 2013 12:25:50 PM UTC+2, mattn wrote: > On Monday, June 3, 2013 6:01:47 PM UTC+9, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > I have not tried using it with double width characters. The original intent > > was to support single width multi-byte characters. I don't know

Re: [patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
On Monday, June 3, 2013 9:29:03 AM UTC+2, mattn wrote: > On Monday, June 3, 2013 7:33:39 AM UTC+9, Christian Wellenbrock wrote: > > > I recently noticed the following inconsistency regarding the 'fillchars' > > and 'statusline options: > > > >

[patch] support multi-byte 'fillchars' in custom 'statusline'

2013-06-02 Fir de Conversatie Christian Wellenbrock
Hi vim_dev, I recently noticed the following inconsistency regarding the 'fillchars' and 'statusline options: - multi-byte 'fillchars' work with default 'statusline': vim -u NONE -c "set ls=2 fcs=stl:●" [No Name] [+]●● - single-byte 'fillchars' work with