Re: "The Vim Mercurial repository" page needs to be updated

Hi Bram, Thank you, but... > > > Either of the three sites should work, "three" should be changed to "two". I also found that the link in https://www.vim.org/develop.php should be updated. > If you prefer to use Mercurial over git, there is an alternative: the > Mercurial mirror on BitBuc

Re: Vim 9 still under development; Kibaale Walk

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:02 PM Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 11:50:10 AM UTC-5 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > The work on Vim 9 is making progress. Most of the syntax has settled > > > down, but there are still a few todo items and we need to ma

Re: [PATCH] os_unix: remove unnecessary process group stuff

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:02 PM Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > > > Processes are not being started correctly with TIOCSCTTY, which does > > > > succeed after setsid(). > > > > > > > > None of that stuff is necessary, including the silencing of SIGHUP. > > > > > > > > It's no

Re: [PATCH] os_unix: remove unnecessary process group stuff

Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > Processes are not being started correctly with TIOCSCTTY, which does > > > succeed after setsid(). > > > > > > None of that stuff is necessary, including the silencing of SIGHUP. > > > > > > It's not even executed when shellpipe is off. > > > > I suspect removing se

Re: Vim 9 still under development; Kibaale Walk

Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 11:50:10 AM UTC-5 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > The work on Vim 9 is making progress. Most of the syntax has settled > > down, but there are still a few todo items and we need to make sure > > everything works well before we can launch it. Yo

Re: Vim 9 still under development; Kibaale Walk

On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 11:50:10 AM UTC-5 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > The work on Vim 9 is making progress. Most of the syntax has settled > down, but there are still a few todo items and we need to make sure > everything works well before we can launch it. You can read more about > it in the

Re: [PATCH] os_unix: remove unnecessary process group stuff

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 12:23 PM Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > Processes are not being started correctly with TIOCSCTTY, which does > > succeed after setsid(). > > > > None of that stuff is necessary, including the silencing of SIGHUP. > > > > It's not even executed when sh

Patch 8.2.2918

Patch 8.2.2918 Problem:Builtin function can be shadowed by global variable. Solution: Check for builtin function before variable. (Yasuhiro Matsumoto, closes #8302) Files: src/eval.c, src/testdir/test_functions.vim *** ../vim-8.2.2917/src/eval.c 2021-05-28 21:06:04.62868

Re: "The Vim Mercurial repository" page needs to be updated

Ken Takata wrote: > https://www.vim.org/mercurial.php needs to be updated because BitBucket > stopped supporting mercurial. > There are there places needs to be updated. > > Here: > > > You can obtain Vim for the first time with either one of these commands: > > hg clone https://bitbucket.org

Patch 8.2.2917

Patch 8.2.2917 Problem:Spellfile functionality not fully tested. Solution: Add tests for SFX with removal of characters, spelling suggestions with NOBREAK and others. (Dominique Pellé, closes #8293) Files: src/testdir/test_spellfile.vim *** ../vim-8.2.2916/src

Re: [PATCH] os_unix: remove unnecessary process group stuff

Felipe Contreras wrote: > Processes are not being started correctly with TIOCSCTTY, which does > succeed after setsid(). > > None of that stuff is necessary, including the silencing of SIGHUP. > > It's not even executed when shellpipe is off. I suspect removing setsid() will cause trouble if

Patch 8.2.2916

Patch 8.2.2916 Problem:Operators are not fully tested. Solution: Add a few more tests. (Yegappan Lakshmanan, closes #8290) Files: src/ops.c, src/testdir/test_netbeans.vim, src/testdir/test_normal.vim, src/testdir/test_visual.vim *** ../vim-8.2.2915/src/ops.c 2021-05-18

Vim 9 still under development; Kibaale Walk

Hello Vim users! The work on Vim 9 is making progress. Most of the syntax has settled down, but there are still a few todo items and we need to make sure everything works well before we can launch it. You can read more about it in the Vim9 help: https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/runtime/d

Patch 8.2.2915

Patch 8.2.2915 Problem:MS-Windows: when using "default" for encoding utf-8 is used. Solution: Use the system encoding. (Ken Takata, closes #8300) Files: src/mbyte.c, runtime/doc/options.txt *** ../vim-8.2.2914/src/mbyte.c 2021-05-30 18:04:14.710468943 +0200 --- src/mbyte.c 2021-05-31

Re: Is :! buggy?

Please CC me. I don't receive messages from the list. On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 12:36:47 AM UTC-5 cbl...@256bit.org wrote: > I have seen this behaviour before, but not sure what is causing this. It > works using `setsid xdg-open` as mentioned e.g. here: > https://vi.stackexchange.com/a/5034/71

Re: [PATCH] os_unix: remove unnecessary process group stuff

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 2:22 AM Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Processes are not being started correctly with TIOCSCTTY, which does > succeed after setsid(). I'm using the following program that uses posix_spawn as a test. When using gvim, shelltemp on, and running it with :! nothing happens. #inc

[PATCH] os_unix: remove unnecessary process group stuff

Processes are not being started correctly with TIOCSCTTY, which does succeed after setsid(). None of that stuff is necessary, including the silencing of SIGHUP. It's not even executed when shellpipe is off. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- src/os_unix.c | 21 - 1 file ch