If you are thinking vim9 accept to use lambda in the expression in while/for,
it will be confusable.
while {ｰ>1}()
...
}
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim
Patch 8.2.0083
Problem:Text properties wrong when tabs and spaces are exchanged.
Solution: Take text properties into account. (Nobuhiro Takasaki,
closes #5427)
Files: src/edit.c, src/testdir/test_textprop.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.0082/src/edit.c 2019-12-01 21:04:37.0 +
Patch 8.2.0082
Problem:When reusing a buffer listeners are not cleared. (Axel Forsman)
Solution: Clear listeners when reusing a buffer. (closes #5431)
Files: src/testdir/test_listener.vim, src/buffer.c
*** ../vim-8.2.0081/src/testdir/test_listener.vim 2019-10-24
20:05:31.0
Patch 8.2.0081
Problem:MS-Windows also need the change to support INIT4().
Solution: Add the ctags arguments. (Ken Takata)
Files: src/Make_cyg_ming.mak, src/Make_mvc.mak
*** ../vim-8.2.0080/src/Make_cyg_ming.mak 2019-12-14 13:09:13.658894314
+0100
--- src/Make_cyg_ming.mak
Ken Takata wrote:
> 2020/1/3 Fri 6:40:12 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> >
> > Patch 8.2.0080
> > Problem:Globals using INIT4() are not in the tags file.
> > Solution: Adjust the tags command.
> > Files:src/configure.ac, src/auto/configure
> >
>
> Similar changes are nee
Ken Takata wrote:
> 2020/1/3 Fri 19:02:13 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
> >
> > > Why you don't use { ?
> >
> > I know this will trigger a discussion. Nearly all languages use blocks
> > ending with "}". It's much easier to see where a block ends that way
Hi Bram,
2020/1/3 Fri 19:02:13 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
>
> Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
>
> > Why you don't use { ?
>
> I know this will trigger a discussion. Nearly all languages use blocks
> ending with "}". It's much easier to see where a block ends that way
> than using "endif", "endw
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Why you don't use { ?
I know this will trigger a discussion. Nearly all languages use blocks
ending with "}". It's much easier to see where a block ends that way
than using "endif", "endwhile", etc., it stands out.
Since we already have the start of the block with
Prabir Shrestha wrote:
> It is great to see the numbers. @Bram What about something like this so it
> is 100% backwards compatible. The best part is that it works in current
> vim8 without any errors.
>
> function! s:greet(name) abort
> "use strict"
> echom a:name
> endfunction
>
> call
